Puma vs. Cherokee vs. Lwan

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Puma

Cherokee

Lwan

Favorites

12

Favorites

0

Favorites

0

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 267
  • 78
  • 783
  • 67
  • 70
  • 70
  • 166
  • 37
  • 0

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is Puma?

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

What is Cherokee?

Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

What is Lwan?

In development for almost 3 years, Lwan was until now a personal research effort that focused mostly on building a solid infrastructure for a lightweight and speedy web server.

Pros about this tool

Why do you like Puma?

Why do you like Cherokee?

Why do you like Lwan?

Cons about this tool

Customers

Latest News

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is ...


Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these