Puma vs. Pow vs. Cherokee

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Puma

Pow

Cherokee

Favorites

13

Favorites

2

Favorites

0

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 267
  • 78
  • 834
  • -
  • 48
  • 499
  • 67
  • 70
  • 70

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is Puma?

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

What is Pow?

Pow is a zero-configuration Rack server for Mac OS X. It makes developing Rails and Rack applications as frictionless as possible. You can install it in ten seconds and have your first app up and running in under a minute. No mucking around with /etc/hosts, no compiling Apache modules, no editing configuration files or installing preference panes. And running multiple apps with multiple versions of Ruby is trivial.

What is Cherokee?

Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

Pros about this tool

Why do you like Puma?

Why do you like Pow?

Why do you like Cherokee?

Companies Using

Integrations

Latest News

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is ...


Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these