Chronix vs IronDB vs Microsoft SQL Server

Chronix
Chronix

1
9
+ 1
0
IronDB
IronDB

0
5
+ 1
0
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server

3.5K
2.5K
+ 1
520
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Chronix?

Chronix is built to store time series highly compressed and for fast access times. In comparison to related time series databases, Chronix does not only take 5 to 171 times less space, but it also shaves off 83% of the access time, and up to 78% off the runtime on a mix of real world queries.

What is IronDB?

IronDB is the best way to store persistent key-value data in the browser. Data saved to IronDB is redundantly stored in Cookies, IndexedDB, LocalStorage, and SessionStorage, and relentlessly self heals if any data therein is deleted or corrupted.

What is Microsoft SQL Server?

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Chronix?
Why do developers choose IronDB?
Why do developers choose Microsoft SQL Server?
    Be the first to leave a pro
      Be the first to leave a pro

      Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      What are the cons of using Chronix?
      What are the cons of using IronDB?
      What are the cons of using Microsoft SQL Server?
        Be the first to leave a con
          Be the first to leave a con
          What companies use Chronix?
          What companies use IronDB?
          What companies use Microsoft SQL Server?
            No companies found
              No companies found

              Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

              What tools integrate with Chronix?
              What tools integrate with IronDB?
              What tools integrate with Microsoft SQL Server?
                No integrations found
                  No integrations found

                  Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

                  What are some alternatives to Chronix, IronDB, and Microsoft SQL Server?
                  MySQL
                  The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
                  PostgreSQL
                  PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
                  MongoDB
                  MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
                  MariaDB
                  Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.
                  SQLite
                  SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.
                  See all alternatives
                  Decisions about Chronix, IronDB, and Microsoft SQL Server
                  No stack decisions found
                  Interest over time
                  Reviews of Chronix, IronDB, and Microsoft SQL Server
                  No reviews found
                  How developers use Chronix, IronDB, and Microsoft SQL Server
                  Avatar of Brillium, Inc.
                  Brillium, Inc. uses Microsoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL Server

                  We've always counted on SQL Server as our database backend. It has served us well over the years. It isn't the cheapest part of our stack, but with the plethora of tools provided by 3rd parties, we have found an incredible and scalable method of keeping our data available and easy to maintain.

                  Avatar of Andrew Miller
                  Andrew Miller uses Microsoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL Server

                  Defacto, industry standard for backend relational databases. Entity Framework makes designing, migrating & maintaining SQL Server databases a breeze. LocalDB is especially helpful during development.

                  Avatar of David Flynn
                  David Flynn uses Microsoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL Server

                  Our core systems that we integrate with are using SQL Server 2012 / 2016 database servers. We use database views on core system databases to help build our domain model.

                  Avatar of Olo
                  Olo uses Microsoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL Server

                  Main transactional database. SQL Server 2012 Enterprise with AlwaysOn Availability Groups for high availability and disaster recovery.

                  Avatar of Arbor Health, LLC
                  Arbor Health, LLC uses Microsoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL Server

                  Managing script output and input, as well as data cleansing.

                  How much does Chronix cost?
                  How much does IronDB cost?
                  How much does Microsoft SQL Server cost?
                  Pricing unavailable
                  Pricing unavailable
                  Pricing unavailable
                  News about Chronix
                  More news
                  News about IronDB
                  More news