CircleCI vs. wercker vs. Test Kitchen
|
|
|
|||||
CircleCI |
wercker |
Test Kitchen |
|||||
Favorites143
|
Favorites33
|
Favorites5
|
|||||
Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats |
|||||||
GitHub Stats |
No public GitHub repository stats available
|
No public GitHub repository stats available
|
|||||
Description |
What is CircleCI?CircleCI’s continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. CircleCI offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp
|
What is wercker?Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.
|
What is Test Kitchen?Test Kitchen has a static, declarative configuration in a .kitchen.yml file at the root of your project. It is designed to execute isolated code run in pristine environments ensuring that no prior state exists. A plugin architecture gives you the freedom to run your code on any cloud, virtualization, or bare metal resources and allows you to write acceptance criteria in whatever framework you desire.
|
||||
Pros about this tool |
|
|
|
||||
Cons about this tool |
|
|
|
||||
Pricing |
|
||||||
Companies |
698 Companies Using CircleCI
|
40 Companies Using wercker
|
5 Companies Using Test Kitchen
|
||||
Integrations |
CircleCI
Integrations
|
wercker
Integrations
|
No integrations listed yet
|
||||
|
What are some alternatives to CircleCI, wercker, and Test Kitchen?
|
|||||||
Latest News |
Headless Chrome for More Reliable, Efficient Browser...
February 15, 2018
How Open Listings Uses CircleCI to Scale Rapidly and...
February 06, 2018
A Brief History of DevOps, Part III: Automated Testi...
February 01, 2018
|
||||||
Reviews of CircleCI, wercker, and Test Kitchen
Easy to setup, great flexibility, awesome support
January 21, 2018 21:02
After trying several CI systems, we stuck with CircleCI because of the inference engine in CircleCI 1.0 made setup a breeze. We were up and running quickly. Builds are reliable, nicely integrated into GitHub, and anytime we've had a question, the support team was there to help. The 2.0 system provides Docker support and far more customization and is still fairly easy to set up with helpful documentation.
Easy to use and super quick
February 15, 2018 11:36
I use CircleCI as part of a cross platform mobile app to build and test the app as well as deploying .apk files to an s3 bucket.
Alongside CircleCI this repo also has a TravisCI setup for iOS. The CircleCI build has always been quicker and since moving from CircleCI v1 to CircleCI v2 it blows the TravisCI build out of the water. I'm really impressed with the performance gains from moving to v2. I'm pretty sure I could achieve similar results in Travis as well, but it was really easy to setup the Android CI build in Circle making use of Docker.
The Best CI
January 30, 2018 17:21
The best CI ever. The easy way you can configure to run your project is amazing!
The ultimate CI tool that you need.
February 07, 2018 10:12
Circle CI is stable, fast, easy to start and has a huge amount of things which you can do with it.
Good availability, stays current, great ease of use
February 07, 2018 11:04
CircleCI has become our CI of choice. The UI is really good and it has all the integrations we need. The 2.0 upgrade was not yet possible for one of our projects due to outdated gems, however, I have been able to get it working for a different one.
CircleCI is an integral part of our CD pipeline
February 28, 2018 12:23
We use it to test every commit we push to github and deploy everything we merge into master for every project.
Easy to Use CI/CD
April 02, 2018 14:34
We use CircleCI to deploy to server. It is much easier than other websites like Travis especially for the free tier. It is especially useful for open source projects that need private access behind the scenes.
Easy to use
April 08, 2018 18:22
It help us with the automated build and test and also provide us with the build artifacts which we can use for the deployment also give use archive for each of our build, this things save us alot of time and cost
Full featured but hard to use
April 19, 2018 18:59
There's a lot of awesome features in CircleCI but it's generally hard to use and figure out. In addition, there seems to be some reliability issue, especially in connection with their third party dependencies.
How developers use CircleCI vs wercker vs Test Kitchen
Pathwright uses CircleCI
Container-based CI service. Runs all of our backend tests, and is equipped to eventually run our client side tests.
Instacart uses CircleCI
We use CircleCI for our tests, but not for our builds. The builds are all manually triggered right now.
gregorynicholas uses CircleCI
continuous integration for mobile native ios builds, server deployments
Oomba uses CircleCI
CircleCI automatically runs all unit and e2e tests, as well as packaging and deploying builds to our live servers.
AngeloR uses CircleCI
We originally used CircleCI as our self-contained build system for our internal node modules. It was very easy to set up and configure. Unfortunately we ended up stepping away from it to Jenkins and then CodePipeline due to better integration with our various applications.
jflynn33 uses CircleCI
We prefer CircleCI because we care about testing our apps. We found it is better to invest the time writing rSPEC tests to ensure we don't insert any regression bugs with new branches. It's also nice to have a fully-automated deployment process from GitHub to Heroku.
PayParty uses CircleCI
We use Circle CI to do test and build automation. And also, do our deployments in stage and prod env.
Marc3842h uses CircleCI
CircleCI is used as continues integration system for shiro and all of its modules.
It automatically deploys the latest GitHub commit to https://shiro.host/.
