StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Citus vs Clickhouse

Citus vs Clickhouse

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Citus
Citus
Stacks60
Followers124
Votes11
GitHub Stars12.0K
Forks736
Clickhouse
Clickhouse
Stacks431
Followers543
Votes85

Citus vs Clickhouse: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Citus and Clickhouse are two popular database management systems with distinctive features and use cases. In this comparison, we will highlight six key differences between Citus and Clickhouse.

  1. Scalability: Citus is a distributed database that scales horizontally by distributing data across multiple nodes, offering linear scalability. It uses sharding to divide the data into smaller chunks and replicates them across different servers. On the other hand, Clickhouse is designed for high-performance analytics and supports massively parallel processing. It horizontally scales by adding more servers and using replication for fault tolerance.

  2. Data Model: Citus is an extension of PostgreSQL, providing SQL querying capabilities and supporting JSON and other PostgreSQL data types. It allows for transactional consistency and supports relational data models with joins and foreign keys. In contrast, Clickhouse is a columnar database optimized for analytical workloads, focusing on read-heavy operations. It uses a denormalized data model and does not support joins or transactions.

  3. Data Compression: Citus supports compression techniques to reduce storage costs and improve query performance. It uses PostgreSQL's built-in compression mechanisms for data compression and decompression. Clickhouse also provides data compression techniques, but it employs column-wise compression, which greatly reduces storage requirements and improves query execution speed.

  4. Query Execution: Citus executes queries by parallelizing them across distributed nodes, processing smaller chunks of data in parallel. It utilizes distributed query planning and optimization techniques to achieve efficient query execution. Clickhouse, being an analytics-focused database, accelerates query execution through vectorized query processing. It performs operations on data in batches, which significantly improves performance compared to row-based processing.

  5. Data Replication: Citus offers replication capabilities to ensure data availability and fault tolerance. It uses PostgreSQL's streaming replication to replicate data across different nodes. This enables automatic failover and provides high availability. In contrast, Clickhouse replicates data using the Raft consensus protocol, which ensures strong consistency for distributed deployments. It supports synchronous and asynchronous replication depending on the desired level of data consistency.

  6. Data Partitioning: Citus partitions the data based on a sharding key to distribute it across different nodes. It manages the data placement and routing of queries to the appropriate shards. This allows for efficient data distribution and parallel query execution. Clickhouse, on the other hand, partitions data based on its internal data structure, known as a "part". Each part represents a subset of data, enabling efficient storage and query execution.

In Summary, Citus offers scalable distributed database capabilities with transactional consistency, while Clickhouse excels at high-performance analytics with columnar storage, vectorized query processing, and efficient data replication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Citus
Citus
Clickhouse
Clickhouse

It's an extension to Postgres that distributes data and queries in a cluster of multiple machines. Its query engine parallelizes incoming SQL queries across these servers to enable human real-time (less than a second) responses on large datasets.

It allows analysis of data that is updated in real time. It offers instant results in most cases: the data is processed faster than it takes to create a query.

Multi-Node Scalable PostgreSQL;Built-in Replication and High Availability;Real-time Reads/Writes On Multiple Nodes;Multi-core Parallel Processing of Queries;Tenant isolation
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
736
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
60
Stacks
431
Followers
124
Followers
543
Votes
11
Votes
85
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Multi-core Parallel Processing
  • 3
    Drop-in PostgreSQL replacement
  • 2
    Distributed with Auto-Sharding
Pros
  • 21
    Fast, very very fast
  • 11
    Good compression ratio
  • 7
    Horizontally scalable
  • 6
    Utilizes all CPU resources
  • 5
    RESTful
Cons
  • 5
    Slow insert operations
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Loggly
Loggly
Java
Java
Rails
Rails
Datadog
Datadog
Logentries
Logentries
Heroku
Heroku
Papertrail
Papertrail
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Citus, Clickhouse?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase