Google App Engine vs. Cloud Foundry vs. Flynn
|
|
|
||||||
Google App Engine |
Cloud Foundry |
Flynn |
||||||
Favorites77
|
Favorites13
|
Favorites11
|
||||||
Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats |
||||||||
GitHub Stats |
No public GitHub repository stats available
|
|||||||
Description |
What is Google App Engine?Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
|
What is Cloud Foundry?Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
|
What is Flynn?Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.
|
|||||
Pros about this tool |
|
|
|
|||||
Pricing |
|
|||||||
Companies |
375 Companies Using Google App Engine
|
5 Companies Using Cloud Foundry
|
1 Companies Using Flynn
|
|||||
Integrations |
Google App Engine
Integrations
|
Cloud Foundry
Integrations
|
Flynn
Integrations
|
|||||
Latest News |
Cloud TPU machine learning accelerators now availabl...
February 12, 2018
Applying the Escalation Policy — CRE life lessons
February 08, 2018
GCP is building its second Japanese region in Osaka
February 07, 2018
|
Managed Pivotal Cloud Foundry Makes its Entrance at ...
December 14, 2017
Spring Cloud Data Flow for Cloud Foundry 1.3.0.M3 re...
December 01, 2017
Binding applications to HashiCorp's Vault with Sprin...
November 28, 2017
|
Reviews of Google App Engine, Cloud Foundry, and Flynn
Easily create scalable backend for mobile
March 27, 2014 07:50
With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less. And it is free (until you need extra scale). I would not recommend to use Java - python is faster and has all new appengine features.
Pros: everything is in one place: task queue, cron, backend instances for data processing, datastore, mapreduce. Cons: you cannot easily move your code from GAE. Even with special 3rd party services.
Easily create scalable backend for mobile
March 26, 2018 00:24
With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less.
How developers use Google App Engine vs Cloud Foundry vs Flynn
vamsiikrishna uses Google App Engine
Cloud instances to run our app, Cloud MySQL , Network Load Balancer
csmith932 uses Google App Engine
PaaS for back-end components, including external data ingestion APIs, front-end web service APIs, hosting of static front-end application assets, back-end data processing pipeline microservices, APIs to storage infrastructure (Cloud SQL and Memcached), and data processing pipeline task queues and cron jobs. Task queue fan-out and auto-scaling of back-end microservice instances provide parallelism for high velocity data processing.
shcheuk uses Google App Engine
checking a swap require a lot of cpu resource, roster normally come out same day of month, every month, at a particular time. Which make very high spike, our flag ship product, iSwap, with the capability looking swap possibility with 10000 other rosters base on user critieria, you need a cloud computing give you this magnitude of computing power. gae did it nicely, user friendly, easy to you, low cost.
abunickabhi uses Google App Engine
Very easy to make cloud computing of ML models , and use containers like Kubernetes.
giovannicandido uses Cloud Foundry
Easy host and monitor the application on the cloud, using a platform that is hight integrated with Spring Framework, but is also agnostic of technology
