CloudAMQP vs IronMQ vs Starling

CloudAMQP
CloudAMQP

35
19
6
IronMQ
IronMQ

29
29
34
Starling
Starling

3
5
0
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is CloudAMQP?

Fully managed, highly available RabbitMQ servers and clusters, on all major compute platforms.

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is Starling?

Starling is a powerful but simple messaging server that enables reliable distributed queuing with an absolutely minimal overhead. It speaks the MemCache protocol for maximum cross-platform compatibility. Any language that speaks MemCache can take advantage of Starling's queue facilities.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose CloudAMQP?
Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do developers choose Starling?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using CloudAMQP?
    What are the cons of using IronMQ?
    What are the cons of using Starling?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use CloudAMQP?
        What companies use IronMQ?
        What companies use Starling?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with CloudAMQP?
        What tools integrate with IronMQ?
        What tools integrate with Starling?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          What are some alternatives to CloudAMQP, IronMQ, and Starling?
          RabbitMQ
          RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
          Kafka
          Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
          Amazon SQS
          Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
          Celery
          Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
          ActiveMQ
          Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about CloudAMQP, IronMQ, and Starling
          No stack decisions found
          Interest over time
          Reviews of CloudAMQP, IronMQ, and Starling
          Avatar of umuro
          Co-Founder at Publitory
          Review ofIronMQIronMQ

          I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.

          Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.

          How developers use CloudAMQP, IronMQ, and Starling
          Avatar of True Fiction Production AB
          True Fiction Production AB uses IronMQIronMQ

          Process queues

          How much does CloudAMQP cost?
          How much does IronMQ cost?
          How much does Starling cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          News about CloudAMQP
          More news