StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. CloudLinux vs FreeBSD

CloudLinux vs FreeBSD

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Stacks250
Followers196
Votes28
CloudLinux
CloudLinux
Stacks18
Followers40
Votes0

CloudLinux vs FreeBSD: What are the differences?

Introduction: CloudLinux and FreeBSD are both operating systems used in web hosting environments. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Security Philosophy: CloudLinux focuses on isolating tenants in a shared hosting environment, limiting the impact of one user on others, and providing enhanced security measures. In contrast, FreeBSD emphasizes security through the use of well-tested code and a focus on minimizing vulnerabilities, rather than isolation.

  2. Licensing: CloudLinux is a commercial operating system that requires a paid license for use, whereas FreeBSD is open-source and can be used free of charge. This difference in licensing can impact the overall cost of using the operating system in a hosting environment.

  3. Package Management: CloudLinux utilizes the YUM (Yellowdog Updater Modified) package manager, which provides easy installation, upgrading, and removal of software packages. FreeBSD uses the Ports Collection, which allows for a more customized and flexible package management approach.

  4. Kernel Type: CloudLinux is based on the Linux kernel, while FreeBSD has its own kernel. This distinction influences various aspects of system behavior, including system calls, device drivers, and overall compatibility with software and hardware.

  5. Resource Management: CloudLinux offers a feature called Lightweight Virtual Environment (LVE) that allows administrators to allocate specific resources, such as CPU, memory, and disk I/O, to individual users or groups. FreeBSD, on the other hand, provides resource management capabilities through tools like FreeBSD Jails, which offer a more comprehensive isolation mechanism but may require additional configuration.

  6. Community and Support: Both CloudLinux and FreeBSD have active communities, but CloudLinux benefits from dedicated commercial support, including regular patches, updates, and technical assistance. FreeBSD also has a vibrant community, but support is primarily community-driven, with updates and patches being released by volunteer contributors.

In Summary, CloudLinux focuses on tenant isolation and enhanced security, requires a paid license, uses the YUM package manager, is based on the Linux kernel, offers resource management through LVE, and has commercial support. FreeBSD emphasizes code security, is open-source, uses the Ports Collection for package management, has its own kernel, provides resource management through FreeBSD Jails, and has a community-driven support model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FreeBSD
FreeBSD
CloudLinux
CloudLinux

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

CloudLinux OS is designed for shared hosting providers. It isolates each customer into a separate “Lightweight Virtualized Environment” (LVE), which partitions, allocates, and limits server resources, like memory, CPU.

KMS And New drm2 Video Drivers; Capsicum Enabled By Default; New Binary Packaging System; Unmapped I/O
-
Statistics
Stacks
250
Stacks
18
Followers
196
Followers
40
Votes
28
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Excellent as Server
  • 6
    Very Stable
  • 4
    Helpful community
  • 2
    Free to use
  • 2
    Ports and packages system is mature and well-supported
Cons
  • 1
    Slower to adopt non-server hardware than Linux
  • 1
    Poor support for laptops, especially wireless cards
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to FreeBSD, CloudLinux?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase