CMake vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview

CMake

Stacks4.0K

Followers294

Votes1

JFrog Artifactory

Stacks342

Followers374

Votes0

CMake vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Introduction

CMake and JFrog Artifactory are two different tools that are frequently used in web development. Below are the key differences between CMake and JFrog Artifactory.

Structure: CMake is a build tool used for compiling code, while JFrog Artifactory is a binary repository manager used for managing and storing binary artifacts.
Functionality: CMake is primarily used for building projects, managing dependencies, and generating build files, while JFrog Artifactory focuses on managing and distributing binary artifacts, ensuring artifact tracing, and promoting artifact reuse.
Build System: CMake generates build files (such as Makefiles or IDE-specific project files) that can be used to build the project on various platforms and build systems. JFrog Artifactory, on the other hand, does not generate build files, but rather stores and manages the built artifacts generated by the build system.
Integration: CMake can be integrated with various build systems, such as Make, Ninja, or IDE-specific build systems. JFrog Artifactory can be integrated with build tools and CI/CD systems, such as Jenkins or Bamboo, to manage the binary artifacts produced by the build process.
Dependency Management: CMake has built-in support for managing dependencies through the use of "find_package" and "target_link_libraries" commands. JFrog Artifactory provides more advanced dependency management features, such as remote repositories, dependency graphs, and conflict resolution.
Scalability: CMake is suitable for small to medium-sized projects, while JFrog Artifactory is designed to handle large-scale projects and enterprise-level deployments, providing scalability and high availability.

In summary, CMake is a build tool used for compiling code and generating build files, while JFrog Artifactory is a binary repository manager used for managing and distributing binary artifacts. CMake focuses on building projects and managing dependencies, while JFrog Artifactory focuses on artifact management and distribution for large-scale projects and enterprise deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CMake, JFrog Artifactory

tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

GitHub

JFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CMake	JFrog Artifactory
It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.	It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
Statistics
Stacks 4.0K	Stacks 342
Followers 294	Followers 374
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Has package registry	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Debian npm

What are some alternatives to CMake, JFrog Artifactory?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

CMake vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Introduction

CMake and JFrog Artifactory are two different tools that are frequently used in web development. Below are the key differences between CMake and JFrog Artifactory.

Structure: CMake is a build tool used for compiling code, while JFrog Artifactory is a binary repository manager used for managing and storing binary artifacts.
Functionality: CMake is primarily used for building projects, managing dependencies, and generating build files, while JFrog Artifactory focuses on managing and distributing binary artifacts, ensuring artifact tracing, and promoting artifact reuse.
Build System: CMake generates build files (such as Makefiles or IDE-specific project files) that can be used to build the project on various platforms and build systems. JFrog Artifactory, on the other hand, does not generate build files, but rather stores and manages the built artifacts generated by the build system.
Integration: CMake can be integrated with various build systems, such as Make, Ninja, or IDE-specific build systems. JFrog Artifactory can be integrated with build tools and CI/CD systems, such as Jenkins or Bamboo, to manage the binary artifacts produced by the build process.
Dependency Management: CMake has built-in support for managing dependencies through the use of "find_package" and "target_link_libraries" commands. JFrog Artifactory provides more advanced dependency management features, such as remote repositories, dependency graphs, and conflict resolution.
Scalability: CMake is suitable for small to medium-sized projects, while JFrog Artifactory is designed to handle large-scale projects and enterprise-level deployments, providing scalability and high availability.

CMake vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview

CMake vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?