Cmder vs Putty

Overview

Cmder

Stacks45

Followers50

Votes0

GitHub Stars26.6K

Forks2.1K

Putty

Stacks182

Followers117

Votes2

Cmder vs Putty: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cmder and Putty are both popular terminal emulators used for command line operations. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Customization Options: Cmder offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to personalize their terminal experience. It supports various themes, fonts, colors, and icon sets, making it highly customizable. On the other hand, Putty provides limited customization options, primarily focusing on functionality rather than aesthetics.
SSH Support: Putty is widely known for its strong SSH client capabilities. It enables secure remote access to servers through SSH protocols, making it the go-to choice for many network administrators and developers. Cmder, on the other hand, does not have built-in SSH support and requires additional tools or configuration to enable SSH functionality.
Tabbed Interface: Cmder offers a tabbed interface, allowing users to have multiple command prompt sessions open within a single window. This feature enhances productivity by enabling users to switch easily between different tasks or projects. Putty, on the other hand, does not have a built-in tabbed interface and requires the use of third-party tools to achieve a similar functionality.
Portability: Cmder is designed to be highly portable and can be easily run from a portable storage device such as a USB flash drive. This allows users to use their personalized terminal environment on any computer without the need for installation or administration privileges. Putty, while lightweight, requires installation on each computer it is used on.
Integration with Windows Shell: Cmder seamlessly integrates with the Windows shell, allowing users to use Cmder as the default command prompt in their Windows environment. This integration enables users to use Cmder's features and customization options within the familiar Windows command prompt environment. Putty does not integrate with the Windows shell and operates as a separate application.
Scripting and Automation: Cmder provides extensive scripting and automation capabilities, allowing users to create and execute complex command sequences. This feature is particularly useful for developers and system administrators who need to automate repetitive tasks. Putty, while it supports scripting through command-line options, does not offer the same level of scripting and automation functionality as Cmder.

In Summary, Cmder offers more customization options, a tabbed interface, portability, integration with the Windows shell, and extensive scripting capabilities compared to Putty, which is well-known for its SSH support but lacks these features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cmder	Putty
It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.	It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.
Total portability; Keyboard shortcuts	SSH client
Statistics
GitHub Stars 26.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 45	Stacks 182
Followers 50	Followers 117
Votes 0	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 More popular 1 Free
Integrations
Windows	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Cmder, Putty?

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

SecureCRT

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Cmder vs Putty: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cmder and Putty are both popular terminal emulators used for command line operations. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Customization Options: Cmder offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to personalize their terminal experience. It supports various themes, fonts, colors, and icon sets, making it highly customizable. On the other hand, Putty provides limited customization options, primarily focusing on functionality rather than aesthetics.
SSH Support: Putty is widely known for its strong SSH client capabilities. It enables secure remote access to servers through SSH protocols, making it the go-to choice for many network administrators and developers. Cmder, on the other hand, does not have built-in SSH support and requires additional tools or configuration to enable SSH functionality.
Tabbed Interface: Cmder offers a tabbed interface, allowing users to have multiple command prompt sessions open within a single window. This feature enhances productivity by enabling users to switch easily between different tasks or projects. Putty, on the other hand, does not have a built-in tabbed interface and requires the use of third-party tools to achieve a similar functionality.
Portability: Cmder is designed to be highly portable and can be easily run from a portable storage device such as a USB flash drive. This allows users to use their personalized terminal environment on any computer without the need for installation or administration privileges. Putty, while lightweight, requires installation on each computer it is used on.
Integration with Windows Shell: Cmder seamlessly integrates with the Windows shell, allowing users to use Cmder as the default command prompt in their Windows environment. This integration enables users to use Cmder's features and customization options within the familiar Windows command prompt environment. Putty does not integrate with the Windows shell and operates as a separate application.
Scripting and Automation: Cmder provides extensive scripting and automation capabilities, allowing users to create and execute complex command sequences. This feature is particularly useful for developers and system administrators who need to automate repetitive tasks. Putty, while it supports scripting through command-line options, does not offer the same level of scripting and automation functionality as Cmder.

Cmder vs Putty

Overview