Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CMS.js

4
37
+ 1
0
Gatsby

3.2K
2.4K
+ 1
121
Hugo

1.3K
1.2K
+ 1
206

CMS.js vs Gatsby vs Hugo: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between CMS.js, Gatsby, and Hugo

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Data Handling and Content Management**: CMS.js is designed for simple websites where content changes infrequently and can be managed directly in the HTML or JavaScript files. On the other hand, Gatsby and Hugo are static site generators that use markdown files or external APIs to manage content, making it easier to update and organize content efficiently. 

2. **Themes and Customization**: Gatsby and Hugo offer a wide range of themes and templates that can be easily customized to create unique and dynamic websites. In contrast, CMS.js relies heavily on manual coding and customization for design changes, which can be time-consuming and less flexible.

3. **Performance and Speed**: Gatsby, with its focus on performance optimization and modern web technologies like React, offers faster loading times and better SEO capabilities compared to CMS.js and Hugo. While Hugo also prioritizes performance, Gatsby stands out for its speed and efficiency.

4. **Community and Support**: Gatsby has a vibrant community with extensive documentation, plugins, and developer support, making it easier for users to troubleshoot issues and extend functionality. CMS.js, and to some extent Hugo, may have limited resources and community support in comparison.

5. **Learning Curve and Ease of Use**: CMS.js is beginner-friendly and suitable for small projects due to its simple setup and minimal configuration requirements. In contrast, Gatsby and Hugo have steeper learning curves, especially for beginners, but offer more robust features and capabilities for complex websites and applications.

6. **Scalability and Flexibility**: While all three platforms are scalable, Gatsby's modular architecture and advanced build tools make it more adaptable and suitable for larger projects that require scalability and complex functionality. CMS.js and Hugo may have limitations in scalability and flexibility in comparison.

In Summary, the key differences between CMS.js, Gatsby, and Hugo lie in their approach to data handling, customization, performance, community support, ease of use, and scalability. Each platform offers unique strengths and capabilities tailored to different project requirements.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CMS.js
Pros of Gatsby
Pros of Hugo
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 28
      Generated websites are super fast
    • 16
      Fast
    • 15
      GraphQL
    • 10
      Progressive Web Apps generation
    • 9
      Easy to connect with lots of CMS via official plugins
    • 9
      Reusable components (React)
    • 7
      Allows to use markdown files as articles
    • 5
      Static-sites
    • 5
      All the benefits of a static website + React+GraphQL
    • 5
      Images
    • 4
      List of starters as base for new project
    • 3
      Easy to connect with Drupal via official plugin
    • 3
      Open source
    • 1
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 1
      Incremental Build
    • 47
      Lightning fast
    • 29
      Single Executable
    • 26
      Easy setup
    • 24
      Great development community
    • 23
      Open source
    • 13
      Write in golang
    • 8
      Not HTML only - JSON, RSS
    • 8
      Hacker mindset
    • 7
      LiveReload built in
    • 4
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 4
      Easy to customize themes
    • 4
      Very fast builds
    • 3
      Well documented
    • 3
      Fast builds
    • 3
      Easy to learn

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of CMS.js
    Cons of Gatsby
    Cons of Hugo
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 6
        No ssr
      • 3
        Very slow builds
      • 3
        Documentation isn't complete.
      • 2
        For-profit
      • 2
        Slow builds
      • 2
        Flash of unstyled content issues
      • 1
        Problematic between develop and build commands
      • 1
        Difficult debugging
      • 1
        Too many dependencies
      • 1
        Plugin driven development
      • 1
        Difficult maintenance
      • 4
        No Plugins/Extensions
      • 2
        Template syntax not friendly
      • 1
        Quick builds

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -
      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is CMS.js?

      CMS.js is fully client-side, Javascript site generator in the spirit of Jekyll that uses plain ol' HTML, CSS and Javascript to generate your website. CMS.js is like a file-based CMS. It takes your content, renders Markdown and delivers a complete website in Single-Page App fashion...without the aid of server-side scripting (no Node.js, PHP, Ruby, etc.).

      What is Gatsby?

      Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

      What is Hugo?

      Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use CMS.js?
      What companies use Gatsby?
      What companies use Hugo?
        No companies found

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with CMS.js?
        What tools integrate with Gatsby?
        What tools integrate with Hugo?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        GitNode.jsFirebase+5
        7
        2343
        What are some alternatives to CMS.js, Gatsby, and Hugo?
        Jekyll
        Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
        VuePress
        A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
        Hexo
        Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
        Middleman
        Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.
        Astro
        It is a new kind of static site builder that delivers lightning-fast performance with a modern developer experience. It combines decades of proven performance best practices with the DX improvements of the component-oriented era. Use your favorite JavaScript framework and automatically ship the bare-minimum amount of JavaScript—by default.
        See all alternatives