Codecov vs Gradle: What are the differences?
Codecov: Hosted coverage reports with awesome features to enhance your CI workflow. Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security; Gradle: A powerful build system for the JVM. Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.
Codecov can be classified as a tool in the "Code Coverage" category, while Gradle is grouped under "Java Build Tools".
Some of the features offered by Codecov are:
- Beautiful Reports
- Pull Request Comments
- Interactive Commit Graphs
On the other hand, Gradle provides the following key features:
- Declarative builds and build-by-convention
- Language for dependency based programming
- Structure your build
"More stable than coveralls" is the top reason why over 14 developers like Codecov, while over 106 developers mention "Flexibility" as the leading cause for choosing Gradle.
Gradle is an open source tool with 9.23K GitHub stars and 2.7K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Gradle's open source repository on GitHub.
Netflix, Lyft, and 9GAG are some of the popular companies that use Gradle, whereas Codecov is used by Repro, ContentSquare, and Talkable. Gradle has a broader approval, being mentioned in 465 company stacks & 360 developers stacks; compared to Codecov, which is listed in 49 company stacks and 29 developer stacks.
My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage
file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage
file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.