StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. OpenTelemetry vs collectd

OpenTelemetry vs collectd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

collectd
collectd
Stacks98
Followers156
Votes5
GitHub Stars3.3K
Forks1.3K
OpenTelemetry
OpenTelemetry
Stacks203
Followers148
Votes4

OpenTelemetry vs collectd: What are the differences?

Introduction OpenTelemetry and collectd are both widely used tools in the observability space, but they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore six important differences between OpenTelemetry and collectd.

  1. Architecture: OpenTelemetry is built with a distributed architecture in mind. It is designed to be a comprehensive observability solution, providing support for distributed tracing, metrics, and logging. On the other hand, collectd is a lightweight system statistics collection daemon, primarily focused on collecting and reporting metrics from a single host.

  2. Language Support: OpenTelemetry is designed to be language-agnostic and provides SDKs for multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, Go, and more. This makes it easy to instrument applications written in different languages. Conversely, collectd has support for collecting metrics from a variety of systems, but it mainly relies on plugins written in C for this purpose.

  3. Community Support: OpenTelemetry is an open-source project governed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). It has a vibrant community of contributors and active development. On the other hand, collectd is also an open-source project but has a smaller community compared to OpenTelemetry.

  4. Integration and Integration Points: OpenTelemetry provides integration with popular observability tools like Jaeger, Prometheus, and Grafana. It offers seamless integration with these tools, allowing users to easily visualize and analyze the collected data. Collectd, on the other hand, has its own ecosystem of plugins that provide integration with various systems and data sources.

  5. Flexibility and Extensibility: OpenTelemetry provides a flexible data model and API, allowing users to capture custom application-specific telemetry data. This makes it highly extensible and adaptable to different use cases. Collectd also provides a plugin architecture that allows users to extend its functionality, but it is primarily focused on system-level statistics collection.

  6. Scalability: OpenTelemetry is designed to handle large-scale distributed environments, where applications are composed of multiple services running across different hosts. It provides features like distributed context propagation, which allows for end-to-end visibility in distributed systems. Collectd, on the other hand, is more suited for single-host monitoring and may require additional tools for collecting and aggregating metrics from multiple hosts.

In summary, OpenTelemetry and collectd differ in their architecture, language support, community, integration points, flexibility, and scalability. OpenTelemetry provides a comprehensive observability solution with distributed tracing, metrics, and logging capabilities, while collectd is a lightweight system statistics collection daemon focused on single-host monitoring.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

collectd
collectd
OpenTelemetry
OpenTelemetry

collectd gathers statistics about the system it is running on and stores this information. Those statistics can then be used to find current performance bottlenecks (i.e. performance analysis) and predict future system load (i.e. capacity planning). Or if you just want pretty graphs of your private server and are fed up with some homegrown solution you're at the right place, too.

It provides a single set of APIs, libraries, agents, and collector services to capture distributed traces and metrics from your application. You can analyze them using Prometheus, Jaeger, and other observability tools.

fast;simple;integrated;easy to operate
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
98
Stacks
203
Followers
156
Followers
148
Votes
5
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Modular, plugins
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 1
    KISS
Pros
  • 4
    OSS

What are some alternatives to collectd, OpenTelemetry?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana