Common Lisp vs Slim Lang: What are the differences?
Developers describe Common Lisp as "The modern, multi-paradigm, high-performance, compiled, ANSI-standardized descendant of the long-running family of Lisp programming languages". Lisp was originally created as a practical mathematical notation for computer programs, influenced by the notation of Alonzo Church's lambda calculus. It quickly became the favored programming language for artificial intelligence (AI) research. As one of the earliest programming languages, Lisp pioneered many ideas in computer science, including tree data structures, automatic storage management, dynamic typing, conditionals, higher-order functions, recursion, and the self-hosting compiler. [source: wikipedia]. On the other hand, Slim Lang is detailed as "Template language whose goal is reduce the syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic". Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.
Common Lisp can be classified as a tool in the "Languages" category, while Slim Lang is grouped under "Templating Languages & Extensions".
"Flexibility" is the primary reason why developers consider Common Lisp over the competitors, whereas "Easier to type and maintain than haml" was stated as the key factor in picking Slim Lang.
Slim Lang is an open source tool with 4.84K GitHub stars and 473 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Slim Lang's open source repository on GitHub.