Hound vs. Infer vs. Coverity Scan
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats |
|||||||||
GitHub Stats |
No public GitHub repository stats available
|
||||||||
Description |
What is Hound?Take care of pesky code reviews with a trusty Hound. Hound reviews GitHub pull requests for style guide violations.
|
What is Infer?Facebook Infer is a static analysis tool - if you give Infer some Objective-C, Java, or C code, it produces a list of potential bugs. Anyone can use Infer to intercept critical bugs before they have shipped to people's phones, and help prevent crashes or poor performance.
|
What is Coverity Scan?Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.
|
||||||
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community! |
|||||||||
Pros |
|
|
|
||||||
Cons |
|
|
|
||||||
Companies |
What companies use Hound?
13 companies on StackShare use Hound
|
What companies use Infer?
7 companies on StackShare use Infer
|
What companies use Coverity Scan?
1 companies on StackShare use Coverity Scan
|
||||||
Integrations |
What tools integrate with Hound?
1 tools on StackShare integrate with Hound
|
What tools integrate with Infer?
4 tools on StackShare integrate with Infer
|
What tools integrate with Coverity Scan?
2 tools on StackShare integrate with Coverity Scan
|
||||||
What are some alternatives to Hound, Infer, and Coverity Scan?
|
|||||||||
