Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docker Compose
Docker Compose

5.4K
3.8K
+ 1
446
RuboCop
RuboCop

192
125
+ 1
38
Add tool

Docker Compose vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

Docker Compose: Define and run multi-container applications with Docker. With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running; RuboCop: A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide. RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Docker Compose belongs to "Container Tools" category of the tech stack, while RuboCop can be primarily classified under "Code Review".

"Multi-container descriptor" is the primary reason why developers consider Docker Compose over the competitors, whereas "Open-source" was stated as the key factor in picking RuboCop.

Docker Compose and RuboCop are both open source tools. Docker Compose with 16.6K GitHub stars and 2.56K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than RuboCop with 10.1K GitHub stars and 2.14K GitHub forks.

StackShare, Typeform, and CircleCI are some of the popular companies that use Docker Compose, whereas RuboCop is used by StackShare, WeLab Limited, and Keplar Agency. Docker Compose has a broader approval, being mentioned in 795 company stacks & 625 developers stacks; compared to RuboCop, which is listed in 44 company stacks and 25 developer stacks.

What is Docker Compose?

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

What is RuboCop?

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Docker Compose?
Why do developers choose RuboCop?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Docker Compose?
    What companies use RuboCop?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docker Compose?
    What tools integrate with RuboCop?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Docker Compose and RuboCop?
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Docker
    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
    Docker Swarm
    Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
    Helm
    Helm is the best way to find, share, and use software built for Kubernetes.
    Ansible
    Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Docker Compose and RuboCop
    Francisco Quintero
    Francisco Quintero
    Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 7 upvotes · 134.3K views
    atDev As ProsDev As Pros
    Node.js
    Node.js
    Rails
    Rails
    Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2
    Heroku
    Heroku
    RuboCop
    RuboCop
    JavaScript
    JavaScript
    ESLint
    ESLint
    Slack
    Slack
    Twist
    Twist

    For many(if not all) small and medium size business time and cost matter a lot.

    That's why languages, frameworks, tools, and services that are easy to use and provide 0 to productive in less time, it's best.

    Maybe Node.js frameworks might provide better features compared to Rails but in terms of MVPs, for us Rails is the leading alternative.

    Amazon EC2 might be cheaper and more customizable than Heroku but in the initial terms of a project, you need to complete configurationos and deploy early.

    Advanced configurations can be done down the road, when the project is running and making money, not before.

    But moving fast isn't the only thing we care about. We also take the job to leave a good codebase from the beginning and because of that we try to follow, as much as we can, style guides in Ruby with RuboCop and in JavaScript with ESLint and StandardJS.

    Finally, comunication and keeping a good history of conversations, decisions, and discussions is important so we use a mix of Slack and Twist

    See more
    Jerome Dalbert
    Jerome Dalbert
    Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare · | 5 upvotes · 124.5K views
    atStackShareStackShare
    GitHub
    GitHub
    CircleCI
    CircleCI
    Code Climate
    Code Climate
    Brakeman
    Brakeman
    RuboCop
    RuboCop
    RSpec
    RSpec
    Rails
    Rails
    Git
    Git
    #ContinuousIntegration

    The continuous integration process for our Rails backend app starts by opening a GitHub pull request. This triggers a CircleCI build and some Code Climate checks.

    The CircleCI build is a workflow that runs the following jobs:

    • check for security vulnerabilities with Brakeman
    • check code quality with RuboCop
    • run RSpec tests in parallel with the knapsack gem, and output test coverage reports with the simplecov gem
    • upload test coverage to Code Climate

    Code Climate checks the following:

    • code quality metrics like code complexity
    • test coverage minimum thresholds

    The CircleCI jobs and Code Climate checks above have corresponding GitHub status checks.

    Once all the mandatory GitHub checks pass and the code+functionality have been reviewed, developers can merge their pull request into our Git master branch. Code is then ready to deploy!

    #ContinuousIntegration

    See more
    Sebastian Gębski
    Sebastian Gębski
    CTO at Shedul/Fresha · | 6 upvotes · 108.7K views
    atFresha EngineeringFresha Engineering
    Docker
    Docker
    Docker Compose
    Docker Compose
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes
    Terraform
    Terraform
    Ansible
    Ansible
    Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2
    Amazon EKS
    Amazon EKS
    Amazon S3
    Amazon S3
    Amazon RDS
    Amazon RDS

    Heroku was a decent choice to start a business, but at some point our platform was too big, too complex & too heterogenic, so Heroku started to be a constraint, not a benefit. First, we've started containerizing our apps with Docker to eliminate "works in my machine" syndrome & uniformize the environment setup. The first orchestration was composed with Docker Compose , but at some point it made sense to move it to Kubernetes. Fortunately, we've made a very good technical decision when starting our work with containers - all the container configuration & provisions HAD (since the beginning) to be done in code (Infrastructure as Code) - we've used Terraform & Ansible for that (correspondingly). This general trend of containerisation was accompanied by another, parallel & equally big project: migrating environments from Heroku to AWS: using Amazon EC2 , Amazon EKS, Amazon S3 & Amazon RDS.

    See more
    Docker
    Docker
    Docker Compose
    Docker Compose
    Jenkins
    Jenkins
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes
    Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2
    Heroku
    Heroku
    FeathersJS
    FeathersJS
    Node.js
    Node.js
    ExpressJS
    ExpressJS
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    React
    React
    Redux
    Redux
    Semantic UI React
    Semantic UI React
    AVA
    AVA
    ESLint
    ESLint
    nginx
    nginx
    GitHub
    GitHub
    #Containerized
    #Containers
    #Backend
    #Stack
    #Frontend

    Recently I have been working on an open source stack to help people consolidate their personal health data in a single database so that AI and analytics apps can be run against it to find personalized treatments. We chose to go with a #containerized approach leveraging Docker #containers with a local development environment setup with Docker Compose and nginx for container routing. For the production environment we chose to pull code from GitHub and build/push images using Jenkins and using Kubernetes to deploy to Amazon EC2.

    We also implemented a dashboard app to handle user authentication/authorization, as well as a custom SSO server that runs on Heroku which allows experts to easily visit more than one instance without having to login repeatedly. The #Backend was implemented using my favorite #Stack which consists of FeathersJS on top of Node.js and ExpressJS with PostgreSQL as the main database. The #Frontend was implemented using React, Redux.js, Semantic UI React and the FeathersJS client. Though testing was light on this project, we chose to use AVA as well as ESLint to keep the codebase clean and consistent.

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Docker Compose and RuboCop
    No reviews found
    How developers use Docker Compose and RuboCop
    Avatar of Chris Saylor
    Chris Saylor uses Docker ComposeDocker Compose

    Since our production deployment makes use of the Convox platform, we use this to describe the containers to be deployed via Convox to AWS ECS.

    We also use this for our local dev environment (previously used vagrant with chef).

    Avatar of Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
    Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) uses Docker ComposeDocker Compose

    Aside from our Minecraft-infrastructure, we compose it with ... Docker Compose! (kinda obious, eh .. ?) This includes for example the web-services, aswell as the monitoring and mail-infrastructure.

    Avatar of sapslaj
    sapslaj uses Docker ComposeDocker Compose

    Docker Compose is just another part of my "infrastructure as code" initiative and allows me to build isolated pieces of systems with their own volumes and networks.

    Avatar of Sathish N
    Sathish N uses Docker ComposeDocker Compose

    Our application will consist of several containers each communicating with each other. Using docker-compose, we can orchestrate several containers at once.

    Avatar of Curabase
    Curabase uses Docker ComposeDocker Compose

    The core tech in ACS (Azure Container Services) we spin up a Kubernetes cluster and deploy our app into staging and production environments here.

    How much does Docker Compose cost?
    How much does RuboCop cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable