Lens vs dockersh

Overview

dockersh

Stacks7

Followers15

Votes4

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks79

Lens

Stacks151

Followers183

Votes9

GitHub Stars23.0K

Forks1.5K

Lens vs dockersh: What are the differences?

Introduction

Lens and dockersh are both tools used for managing containers in Docker environments. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

User Interface: Lens provides a GUI-based user interface that offers a more visually intuitive way to interact with Docker environments, while dockersh is command-line based, which may appeal more to users comfortable with terminal interfaces.
Purpose: Lens is designed as a Kubernetes IDE, offering additional functionalities beyond container management, like monitoring and logging. On the other hand, dockersh focuses solely on container management tasks within Docker environments.
Resource Consumption: Lens, being a GUI tool, tends to consume more system resources compared to dockersh, which is a lightweight command-line utility, making dockersh more suitable for resource-sensitive environments.
Customization: Dockersh allows for more customization and scripting capabilities due to its command-line nature, providing users with greater control over their container management workflows. Lens, while offering a user-friendly interface, may have limitations in this aspect.
Security Configuration: Dockersh focuses on providing secure container access and management, with features like user privilege settings and environment isolation, while Lens may not offer the same level of security configuration options by default.
Integration with Docker Ecosystem: Lens seamlessly integrates with various components of the Docker ecosystem, offering a comprehensive solution for managing containers, while dockersh may require additional configurations for integration with certain Docker tools or services.

In Summary, Lens and dockersh differ in user interface, purpose, resource consumption, customization, security configuration, and integration with the Docker ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

dockersh	Lens
dockersh is designed to be used as a login shell on machines with multiple interactive users. When a user invokes dockersh, it will bring up a Docker container (if not already running), and then spawn a new interactive shell in the container's namespace.	It is the only IDE you’ll ever need to take control of your Kubernetes clusters. It is a standalone application for MacOS, Windows and Linux operating systems. It is open source and free.
-	Multi Cluster Management; Multiple Workspaces; Built-In Prometheus Stats; Built-in Helm Applications Management; Context Aware Terminal;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.3K	GitHub Stars 23.0K
GitHub Forks 79	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 7	Stacks 151
Followers 15	Followers 183
Votes 4	Votes 9
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Privacy 1 Secure 1 Multiple users to ssh onto a single box 1 Isolation	Pros 4 Keep track of cluster changes 2 Open Source 2 Easy management of multiple clusters 1 Local installation, not SaaS
Integrations
Docker	Kubernetes Linux macOS Windows

What are some alternatives to dockersh, Lens?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Lens vs dockersh: What are the differences?

Introduction

Lens and dockersh are both tools used for managing containers in Docker environments. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

User Interface: Lens provides a GUI-based user interface that offers a more visually intuitive way to interact with Docker environments, while dockersh is command-line based, which may appeal more to users comfortable with terminal interfaces.
Purpose: Lens is designed as a Kubernetes IDE, offering additional functionalities beyond container management, like monitoring and logging. On the other hand, dockersh focuses solely on container management tasks within Docker environments.
Resource Consumption: Lens, being a GUI tool, tends to consume more system resources compared to dockersh, which is a lightweight command-line utility, making dockersh more suitable for resource-sensitive environments.
Customization: Dockersh allows for more customization and scripting capabilities due to its command-line nature, providing users with greater control over their container management workflows. Lens, while offering a user-friendly interface, may have limitations in this aspect.
Security Configuration: Dockersh focuses on providing secure container access and management, with features like user privilege settings and environment isolation, while Lens may not offer the same level of security configuration options by default.
Integration with Docker Ecosystem: Lens seamlessly integrates with various components of the Docker ecosystem, offering a comprehensive solution for managing containers, while dockersh may require additional configurations for integration with certain Docker tools or services.

In Summary, Lens and dockersh differ in user interface, purpose, resource consumption, customization, security configuration, and integration with the Docker ecosystem.