DodgerCMS vs Hugo vs Wintersmith

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

DodgerCMS

4
10
+ 1
0
Hugo

1.3K
1.2K
+ 1
206
Wintersmith

7
12
+ 1
1
Advice on DodgerCMS, Hugo, and Wintersmith
Needs advice
on
GatsbyGatsbyHugoHugo
and
Next.jsNext.js
in

Hi everyone, I'm trying to decide which front-end tool, that will likely use server-side rendering (SSR), in hopes it'll be faster. The end-user will upload a document and they see text output on their screen (like SaaS or microservice). I read that Gatsby can also do SSR. Also want to add a headless CMS that is easy to use.

Backend is in Go. Open to ideas. Thank you.

See more
Replies (2)
Vishal Gupta
Senior Architect at Mindtree Ltd · | 3 upvotes · 26.9K views
Recommends
on
GatsbyGatsbyNext.jsNext.js

If your purpose is plain simply to upload a file which can handle by backend service than Gatsby is good enough assuming you have other content pages which will benefit from faster page loads for those Headless CMS driven pages. But if you have more logical/functional aspects like deciding content/personalization at server side of web application than choose NextJS.

See more
Leonard Daume
CTO - Doing the right things right at QYRAGY GmbH · | 2 upvotes · 5.5K views
Recommends
on
AstroAstroNext.jsNext.js

I have experience with Hugo and Next.js, but not with Gatsby. I would go with Next.js. However, I used Astro for my last project, so I would recommend Astro. Astro is much faster and you can use almost any frontend framework if you need to.

See more
Decisions about DodgerCMS, Hugo, and Wintersmith
Manuel Feller
Frontend Engineer at BI X · | 4 upvotes · 162.6K views

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of DodgerCMS
Pros of Hugo
Pros of Wintersmith
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 47
      Lightning fast
    • 29
      Single Executable
    • 26
      Easy setup
    • 24
      Great development community
    • 23
      Open source
    • 13
      Write in golang
    • 8
      Not HTML only - JSON, RSS
    • 8
      Hacker mindset
    • 7
      LiveReload built in
    • 4
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 4
      Easy to customize themes
    • 4
      Very fast builds
    • 3
      Well documented
    • 3
      Fast builds
    • 3
      Easy to learn
    • 1
      Easy setup

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of DodgerCMS
    Cons of Hugo
    Cons of Wintersmith
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 4
        No Plugins/Extensions
      • 2
        Template syntax not friendly
      • 1
        Quick builds
        Be the first to leave a con

        Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

        No Stats
        - No public GitHub repository available -

        What is DodgerCMS?

        DodgerCMS is a static markdown CMS built on top of Amazon S3. It is a clean and simple alternative to heavy content management systems. There are no databases to manage, deployments to monitor, or massive configuration files. Just focus on writing your content and the results are live immediately.

        What is Hugo?

        Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

        What is Wintersmith?

        Wintersmith is a simple yet flexible static site generator. It takes contents (markdown, less, scripts, etc), transforms them using plugins and outputs a static website (html, css, images, etc) that you can host anywhere.

        Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

        What companies use DodgerCMS?
        What companies use Hugo?
        What companies use Wintersmith?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with DodgerCMS?
          What tools integrate with Hugo?
          What tools integrate with Wintersmith?

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          Blog Posts

          What are some alternatives to DodgerCMS, Hugo, and Wintersmith?
          Gatsby
          Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.
          Jekyll
          Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
          VuePress
          A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
          Hexo
          Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
          Astro
          It is a new kind of static site builder that delivers lightning-fast performance with a modern developer experience. It combines decades of proven performance best practices with the DX improvements of the component-oriented era. Use your favorite JavaScript framework and automatically ship the bare-minimum amount of JavaScript—by default.
          See all alternatives