Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Eclipse vs Red Hat CodeReady Studio: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Eclipse and Red Hat CodeReady Studio
Both Eclipse and Red Hat CodeReady Studio are widely used integrated development environments (IDEs) for software development. Although both of them share similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart.
Version Control Integration: Eclipse provides support for various version control systems like Git, SVN, and CVS. On the other hand, Red Hat CodeReady Studio mainly focuses on Git integration, making it easier for developers to work with one of the most popular version control systems.
Server Integration: Eclipse allows developers to easily integrate with different application servers, such as Apache Tomcat and IBM WebSphere. Conversely, Red Hat CodeReady Studio is specifically designed for Red Hat OpenShift, offering seamless integration and advanced features tailored for developing applications on this container platform.
JVM Support: Eclipse is built on Java Virtual Machine (JVM), providing developers with the flexibility to work on multiple programming languages, including Java, Python, and C++. Red Hat CodeReady Studio, being based on Eclipse, inherits this capability but is more focused on Java development and provides additional support for enterprise Java frameworks like JBoss and WildFly.
Enhanced Enterprise Features: Red Hat CodeReady Studio is well-suited for enterprise application development with its robust tooling support for Java EE, MicroProfile, and Cloud-based technologies. Eclipse, on the other hand, offers a broad range of plugins and extensions, making it more adaptable and customizable for different development scenarios and languages.
Commercial Support: While Eclipse is an open-source project and community-driven, Red Hat CodeReady Studio is a commercial product and offers professional support. This additional support can be valuable for organizations that require dedicated assistance in case of issues or need extended features specific to their business requirements.
IntelliSense and Code Assistance: Eclipse is often praised for its comprehensive code assistance features, including intelligent auto-completion, error detection, and quick fixes. Red Hat CodeReady Studio builds upon this foundation and adds additional enterprise-centric features targeted towards Java developers, such as support for Red Hat Fuse for integration development.
In summary, Eclipse and Red Hat CodeReady Studio differ in their version control integration, server integration, JVM support, enterprise features, commercial support, and code assistance capabilities. The choice between the two would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the developers or organizations.
UPDATE: Thanks for the great response. I am going to start with VSCode based on the open source and free version that will allow me to grow into other languages, but not cost me a license ..yet.
I have been working with software development for 12 years, but I am just beginning my journey to learn to code. I am starting with Python following the suggestion of some of my coworkers. They are split between Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA for IDEs that they use and PyCharm is new to me. Which IDE would you suggest for a beginner that will allow expansion to Java, JavaScript, and eventually AngularJS and possibly mobile applications?
Pycharm is great for python development, but can feel sometimes slow and community version has Somme very annoying restrictions (like they disabled jupyter notebooks plugin and made it premium feature). I personally started looking into VS Code as an alternative, and it has some very good potential. I suggest you take it into account.
The Community version of PyCharm is free and should give you what you need to get started with Python. Both PyCharm and IntelliJ are made by JetBrains. IntelliJ is initially focused on Java but you can get plugins for lots of other things. I subscribe to JetBrains' Toolbox: https://www.jetbrains.com/toolbox-app/ and have access to all of their great tools.
I couldn't imagine using a development tool other than the IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate All Products Pack. A single license allows me to work directly on my server running Ubuntu and/or my workstation running Windows 10 Pro simultaneously. My current project uses HTML, W3CSS, JavaScript, Java, Groovy, Grails, C, GO, Python, Flask, and Rust. For me it's worth every penny of the $150 license fee. And you can try it for free.
Hi, I will give my opinion based on my experience. I have used PyCharm, both community and Professional version. The community has limited functions, like you can't use a Jupyter notebook whereas it's available in the Professional version. PyCharm is slower compared to Visual Studio Code. Also Visual Studio Code is an editor which supports various languages. I myself have used both Visual Studio Code and PyCharm. I feel Visual Studio Code would be better choice. You may as well decide based upon your requirements.
Visual Studio code is easy to use, has a good UI, and a large community. Python works great with it, but unlike some other editors, it works with most languages either by default or by downloading a plugin. VS Code has built in linting, syntax coloring, autocompletes (IntelliSense), and an api for plugins to do there own tooling.
I'd personally recommend Visual Studio Code as it gives you the flexibility of working in any language, so long as there are extensions to support it. It gives you the flexibility to learn Python, venture into Java, Javascript, and eventually AngularJS, and potentially mobile applications. It's also free and you can install it on your personal computer. I think Visual Studio Code would serve your intended use case best.
IntelliJ really is the best for Java, I switched from eclipse years ago and never looked back. As for javascript, python and angular either using the standalone products from jetbrains (pycharm for python, webstorm for js) or installing the relevant plugins for InteliJ will be your best bet. Pycharm etc. are really just InteliJ with some additional plugins installed.
If you starting with Python then PyCharm is better. For Java I would suggest to go with IntelliJ IDEA but people also prefer eclipse so I would say try both and then decide. For JS/Angular/React I would suggest go with VSCode. I personally use it and prefer as its light weight and have good integration with chrome for frontend development.
PyCharm, IntelliJ IDEA are both products of JetBrains. They have a free (limited feature) and paid edition. Eclipse is free. VSCode is also free.
Easy to learn and everything you need
This is a very easy to use tool and gives you the opportunity to start coding right after the installation with almost everything setup automatically by the tool.
Pycharm is all you need to get start coding in python or any of its framework. Its an awesome tool you should give it a try :)
All three are great, however, I believe that IntelliJ IDEA's multiple IDE's are slightly more straight-forward and more up-to date than Eclipse. If I had to choose one specifically for Python projects I would go with PyCharm.
I originally chose IntelliJ over Eclipse, as it was close enough to the look and feel of Visual Studio and we do go back and forth between the two. We really begin to love IntelliJ and their suite of IDEs so we are now using AppCode for the IOS development because the workflow is identical with the IntelliJ. IntelliJ is super complex and intimidating at first but it does afford a lot of nice utilities to get us produce clean code.
Pros of Eclipse
- Does it all131
- Integrates with most of tools76
- Easy to use64
- Java IDE63
- Best Java IDE32
- Open source9
- Hard for newbews3
- Great gdb integration2
- Professional2
- Good Git client allowing direct stage area edit2
- True open source with huge contribution2
- Great code suggestions2
- Extensible2
- Lightweight2
- Works with php0
Pros of Red Hat CodeReady Studio
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Eclipse
- 2000 Design14
- Bad performance9
- Hard to use4