CloudFlare vs EdgeCast: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CloudFlare and EdgeCast are both content delivery networks (CDNs) that aim to improve website performance and reliability by caching content at multiple server locations around the world. While they have similar goals, there are several key differences between these two CDNs.

1. Network Size: One significant difference is the network size of CloudFlare and EdgeCast. CloudFlare operates one of the largest CDN networks with over 200 data centers in more than 100 countries, allowing for broader coverage and faster content delivery. On the other hand, EdgeCast has a smaller network, with approximately 50 data centers globally.

2. Pricing Structure: Another notable difference is the pricing structure of the two CDNs. CloudFlare offers a free tier that provides basic CDN functionality, making it more accessible to small and medium-sized websites. They also offer additional features and paid plans for more advanced needs. EdgeCast, on the other hand, primarily caters to enterprise-level customers and does not provide a free tier. Their pricing is typically higher, but they offer more enterprise-focused features and customization options.

3. Security Features: Both CloudFlare and EdgeCast offer security features to protect websites from various threats, such as DDoS attacks and malware. However, CloudFlare is well-known for its robust security offerings, including its Web Application Firewall (WAF), SSL/TLS encryption, and DDoS mitigation capabilities. EdgeCast also provides security features but may not have the same level of depth and customization options as CloudFlare.

4. Global Load Balancing: CloudFlare incorporates a global load balancing feature that automatically distributes traffic across multiple data centers, ensuring optimal performance and high availability. This feature helps mitigate the impact of server failures and reduces latency. EdgeCast also offers load balancing capabilities, but the specifics and level of control may vary compared to CloudFlare.

5. DNS Services Integration: CloudFlare operates as a full-service DNS provider, allowing customers to manage their domain's DNS records in addition to CDN services. It offers advanced DNS capabilities, such as DNSSEC, Anycast DNS, and easy integration with their CDN network. EdgeCast, while offering DNS management features, may not have the same level of integration and additional DNS features as CloudFlare.

6. API and Automation: CloudFlare provides a comprehensive and developer-friendly API that allows users to automate various CDN management tasks, such as purging caches, configuring rules, and managing DNS records. This API enables easy integration with other systems and customizations. EdgeCast also offers an API for automation but may have differences in functionality and ease of use compared to CloudFlare.

In summary, CloudFlare and EdgeCast differ in terms of network size, pricing structure, security features, global load balancing capabilities, DNS services integration, and API and automation options. These differences make each CDN suitable for specific customer needs and preferences.