StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Elasticsearch vs Google Cloud Datastore

Elasticsearch vs Google Cloud Datastore

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
Google Cloud Datastore
Google Cloud Datastore
Stacks290
Followers357
Votes12

Elasticsearch vs Google Cloud Datastore: What are the differences?

Introduction

Elasticsearch and Google Cloud Datastore are two popular data storage and retrieval systems. While they both serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between them. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Scalability: One key difference between Elasticsearch and Google Cloud Datastore is their scalability. Elasticsearch is highly scalable, allowing you to distribute your data across multiple nodes and handle large volumes of data and high loads efficiently. On the other hand, Google Cloud Datastore has limited scalability and is more suitable for small to medium-sized workloads.

  2. Querying and Search Capabilities: Elasticsearch is built specifically for searching and provides powerful querying capabilities. It supports full-text search, aggregations, filtering, and ranked search results. Google Cloud Datastore, on the other hand, has limited querying and search capabilities. It is primarily a NoSQL document datastore with basic filtering and sorting options.

  3. Data Consistency: Another difference between Elasticsearch and Google Cloud Datastore is their approach to data consistency. Elasticsearch sacrifices some level of data consistency to achieve high availability and fast search performance. It uses eventual consistency, where changes to the data may take some time to propagate across all nodes in the cluster. In contrast, Google Cloud Datastore guarantees strong data consistency, ensuring that all read operations return the most up-to-date data.

  4. Schema Flexibility: Elasticsearch is schema-less, allowing you to index and search any JSON document without the need for a predefined schema. This makes it highly flexible and suitable for applications with evolving data structures. Google Cloud Datastore, on the other hand, requires a predefined schema for each kind (entity type). Any changes to the schema require updates and migrations.

  5. Indexing and Data Retrieval: Elasticsearch excels in indexing and data retrieval speed, making it a great choice for real-time search applications. It uses inverted indices for efficient searching and retrieval. Google Cloud Datastore, while capable of fast retrieval, may not perform as well as Elasticsearch for high-speed search scenarios.

  6. Operational Complexity: While Elasticsearch offers powerful search capabilities, it comes with a higher level of operational complexity. Setting up and managing Elasticsearch clusters require expertise in distributed systems and can be challenging. Google Cloud Datastore, on the other hand, is a fully managed service, abstracting away the complexity of infrastructure management.

In summary, Elasticsearch and Google Cloud Datastore differ in terms of scalability, querying capabilities, data consistency, schema flexibility, indexing speed, and operational complexity. Depending on your specific use case and requirements, you can choose the one that best suits your needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, Google Cloud Datastore

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Google Cloud Datastore
Google Cloud Datastore

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Schemaless access, with SQL-like querying;Managed database;Autoscale with your users;ACID transactions;Built-in redundancy;Local development tools
Statistics
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
290
Followers
27.1K
Followers
357
Votes
1.6K
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 7
    High scalability
  • 2
    Ability to query any property
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Pay for what you use
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, Google Cloud Datastore?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Cloudant

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase