Ember.js vs KnockoutJS

Overview

Ember.js

Stacks1.6K

Followers865

Votes775

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks4.2K

Knockout

Stacks369

Followers202

Votes6

GitHub Stars10.5K

Forks1.5K

Ember.js vs KnockoutJS: What are the differences?

<Ember.js and KnockoutJS are both popular JavaScript frameworks used for building web applications. Ember.js is a full-featured framework that follows the convention over configuration principle, while KnockoutJS is a lightweight library that emphasizes declarative bindings and automatic UI updates. Here are key differences between Ember.js and KnockoutJS.>

Data Binding: Ember.js provides two-way data binding, meaning that changes in the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, offers only one-way data binding, where changes in the model are propagated to the view but not the other way around.
Component Architecture: Ember.js has a built-in component architecture that encourages the creation of reusable and encapsulated UI components. In contrast, KnockoutJS does not have a native component system, requiring developers to implement their own patterns for componentization.
Routing: Ember.js comes with a robust routing system out of the box, allowing developers to define multiple routes for different URL paths and templates. KnockoutJS, however, lacks a built-in routing mechanism and requires the use of third-party libraries or manual implementation for handling navigation within a single-page application.
Scalability: Ember.js is designed for large-scale applications with extensive features and functionality, making it suitable for complex projects that require a high degree of structure and organization. KnockoutJS, while powerful in its simplicity, may struggle to maintain performance and organization in larger applications due to its lightweight nature.
Community and Ecosystem: Ember.js has a strong and active community, with a well-documented ecosystem that includes plugins, addons, and tools to enhance development efficiency. KnockoutJS, while having its own community and resources, may not offer as extensive a range of resources and support as Ember.js.
Learning Curve: Ember.js has a steeper learning curve compared to KnockoutJS, primarily due to its convention-driven approach and comprehensive set of features. KnockoutJS, with its focus on simplicity and ease of use, may be more beginner-friendly for developers looking to quickly get started with data binding and UI updates in web applications.

In Summary, Ember.js and KnockoutJS differ in data binding capabilities, component architecture, routing, scalability, community support, and learning curve, making them suitable for different types of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ember.js, Knockout

neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js	Knockout
A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.	It is a JavaScript library that helps you to create rich, responsive display and editor user interfaces with a clean underlying data model. Any time you have sections of UI that update dynamically (e.g., changing depending on the user’s actions or when an external data source changes), it can help you implement it more simply and maintainably.
Creating web apps;Building UI	Easily associate DOM elements with model data using a concise, readable syntax; When your data model's state changes, your UI updates automatically; Implicitly set up chains of relationships between model data, to transform and combine it; Quickly generate sophisticated, nested UIs as a function of your model data
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.6K	GitHub Stars 10.5K
GitHub Forks 4.2K	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 369
Followers 865	Followers 202
Votes 775	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 126 Elegant 97 Quick to develop 83 Great mvc 82 Great community 73 Great router Cons 2 Too much convention, too little configuration 2 Very little flexibility 1 Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps 1 Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful	Pros 3 Data centered application 2 Great for validations 1 Open source
Integrations
Node.js AngularJS Bootstrap	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, Knockout?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Ember.js vs KnockoutJS: What are the differences?

Data Binding: Ember.js provides two-way data binding, meaning that changes in the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. KnockoutJS, on the other hand, offers only one-way data binding, where changes in the model are propagated to the view but not the other way around.
Component Architecture: Ember.js has a built-in component architecture that encourages the creation of reusable and encapsulated UI components. In contrast, KnockoutJS does not have a native component system, requiring developers to implement their own patterns for componentization.
Routing: Ember.js comes with a robust routing system out of the box, allowing developers to define multiple routes for different URL paths and templates. KnockoutJS, however, lacks a built-in routing mechanism and requires the use of third-party libraries or manual implementation for handling navigation within a single-page application.
Scalability: Ember.js is designed for large-scale applications with extensive features and functionality, making it suitable for complex projects that require a high degree of structure and organization. KnockoutJS, while powerful in its simplicity, may struggle to maintain performance and organization in larger applications due to its lightweight nature.
Community and Ecosystem: Ember.js has a strong and active community, with a well-documented ecosystem that includes plugins, addons, and tools to enhance development efficiency. KnockoutJS, while having its own community and resources, may not offer as extensive a range of resources and support as Ember.js.
Learning Curve: Ember.js has a steeper learning curve compared to KnockoutJS, primarily due to its convention-driven approach and comprehensive set of features. KnockoutJS, with its focus on simplicity and ease of use, may be more beginner-friendly for developers looking to quickly get started with data binding and UI updates in web applications.

Ember.js vs KnockoutJS

Overview