Escher vs Mojolicious: What are the differences?
Developers describe Escher as "An Elm-like web framework for Julia". A web server for 2016. Escher's built-in web server allows you to create interactive UIs with very little code. It takes care of messaging between Julia and the browser under-the-hood. It can also hot-load code: you can see your UI evolve as you save your changes to it. On the other hand, Mojolicious is detailed as "Perl real-time web framework". Back in the early days of the web, many people learned Perl because of a wonderful Perl library called CGI. It was simple enough to get started without knowing much about the language and powerful enough to keep you going, learning by doing was much fun. While most of the techniques used are outdated now, the idea behind it is not. Mojolicious is a new attempt at implementing this idea using state of the art technology.
Escher and Mojolicious can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Escher and Mojolicious are both open source tools. Mojolicious with 2.12K GitHub stars and 498 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Escher with 312 GitHub stars and 63 GitHub forks.
What is Escher?
What is Mojolicious?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Escher?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Escher?
What are the cons of using Mojolicious?
What companies use Escher?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Web part is fully written on top of Mojolicious. Thanks Sebastian Riedel and all the contributors for the great framework!
Веб бэкенд написан полностью на Mojolicious. Спасибо Риделю и всем участникам за этот фреймворк!