Escher vs StimulusReflex

Overview

Escher

Stacks4

Followers11

Votes0

StimulusReflex

Stacks11

Followers12

Votes8

StimulusReflex vs Escher: What are the differences?

Developers describe StimulusReflex as "Build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails". It is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast.

It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love.. On the other hand, Escher is detailed as "An Elm-like web framework for Julia". A web server for 2016. Escher's built-in web server allows you to create interactive UIs with very little code. It takes care of messaging between Julia and the browser under-the-hood. It can also hot-load code: you can see your UI evolve as you save your changes to it.

StimulusReflex and Escher belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Escher is an open source tool with 324 GitHub stars and 65 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Escher's open source repository on GitHub.

Detailed Comparison

Escher	StimulusReflex
A web server for 2016. Escher's built-in web server allows you to create interactive UIs with very little code. It takes care of messaging between Julia and the browser under-the-hood. It can also hot-load code: you can see your UI evolve as you save your changes to it.	It is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails. It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast. It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love.
-	Server-rendered HTML, delivered in miliseconds over the wire via Websockets; ERB templates and partials, with first-class ViewComponent support; Russian doll caching and ActiveJob; StimulusJS and Turbolinks; Built with CableReady, our secret power-move
Statistics
Stacks 4	Stacks 11
Followers 11	Followers 12
Votes 0	Votes 8
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 Reactive stateless frontends 2 Deklarative - no Javascript 2 Most simple extension of the MVC model 2 Based on CableReady for dom diffing Cons 1 Rails backend needed
Integrations
Julia	Rails

What are some alternatives to Escher, StimulusReflex?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.