StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Total.js

ExpressJS vs Total.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Total.js
Total.js
Stacks20
Followers62
Votes37
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks446

ExpressJS vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

ExpressJS and Total.js are both popular web application frameworks for Node.js. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two. In this article, I will outline six major differences between ExpressJS and Total.js, highlighting their unique features and functionalities.

  1. Routing: ExpressJS follows a conventional routing approach, where developers define routes using HTTP methods and URL paths. Total.js, on the other hand, utilizes a more advanced routing system called Flow, which allows developers to define routes using both conventional and flow-based approaches. This provides greater flexibility and control in handling incoming requests.

  2. Middleware: ExpressJS offers a wide range of middleware options, allowing developers to add additional functionalities to their applications easily. Total.js takes a more modular approach with built-in middleware, where various functionalities are implemented as separate modules. This promotes code reusability and simplifies the development process.

  3. Model-View-Controller (MVC) Architecture: ExpressJS does not provide a specific architecture pattern out of the box. It allows developers to structure their applications using any desired pattern. Total.js, on the other hand, follows a strict MVC architecture, providing a clear separation between data models, views, and controllers. This promotes a more organized and maintainable codebase.

  4. Real-time capabilities: Total.js has built-in support for real-time communication through WebSockets, allowing developers to create interactive and responsive applications. ExpressJS, however, does not have native support for real-time capabilities and requires additional libraries or frameworks to implement such functionality.

  5. Authentication and Authorization: ExpressJS provides basic authentication and authorization functionalities through middleware, but developers need to configure and customize these functionalities themselves. Total.js offers a more comprehensive authentication and authorization system out of the box, making it easier to secure applications and manage user access.

  6. Database integration: ExpressJS does not have built-in support for any specific database, giving developers the freedom to choose any database of their preference. Total.js, on the other hand, comes with its own built-in NoSQL database called 'SuperAdmin', making it easier to create and manage databases within the framework.

In summary, ExpressJS and Total.js differ in their routing approach, middleware handling, architectural patterns, real-time capabilities, authentication and authorization, and database integration. Each framework has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the developer.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Total.js
Total.js

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
446
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
20
Followers
24.0K
Followers
62
Votes
1.6K
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 5
    Rapid development
  • 5
    Fast
  • 4
    Low-code tools
  • 4
    Great support
  • 3
    UI components
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of source code documentation
  • 2
    Developed as "one man show"
  • 2
    Poor design - 4000 line files
  • 2
    Poor design
  • 2
    Poor community
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
npm
npm
Node.js
Node.js
PostGraphile
PostGraphile
Sentry
Sentry

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Total.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase