Famo.us vs Flux: What are the differences?
"Speedy as native apps" is the top reason why over 13 developers like Famo.us, while over 43 developers mention "Unidirectional data flow" as the leading cause for choosing Flux.
Famo.us and Flux are both open source tools. Flux with 16.2K GitHub stars and 3.62K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Famo.us with 6.48K GitHub stars and 765 GitHub forks.
What is Famo.us?
What is Flux?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Famo.us?
What are the cons of using Flux?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
We are in the middle of a change of the stack on the front end. So we used Backbone.js with Marionette. Then we also created our own implementation of a Flux kind of flow. We call it eb-flux. We have worked with Marionette for a long time. Then at some point we start evolving and end up having a kind of Redux.js-style architecture, but with Marionette.
But then maybe one and a half years ago, we started moving into React and that's why we created the Eventbrite design system. It's a really nice project that probably could be open sourced. It's a library of components for our React components.
With the help of that library, we are building our new stack with React and sometimes Redux when it's necessary.
"Idiot proof MVC" using transactional pub/sub between models, views, and controllers to establish reliable one-way data flow. Combines well with Polymer web components to create a modular, loosely coupled front-end architecture.