Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Famo.us vs Flux: What are the differences?
Developers describe Famo.us as "A JavaScript framework for everyone who wants to build beautiful experiences on any device". Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript. On the other hand, Flux is detailed as "Application Architecture for Building User Interfaces". Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.
Famo.us and Flux belong to "Javascript UI Libraries" category of the tech stack.
"Speedy as native apps" is the top reason why over 13 developers like Famo.us, while over 43 developers mention "Unidirectional data flow" as the leading cause for choosing Flux.
Famo.us and Flux are both open source tools. Flux with 16.2K GitHub stars and 3.62K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Famo.us with 6.48K GitHub stars and 765 GitHub forks.
Pros of Famo.us
- Speedy as native apps14
- Future11
- WebGL9
- Javascript9
- Components6
- 3D physics engine6
- Open source6
- Performance5
- Rendering Engine for the Web5
- Runs on Android4
- Works with Angular3
- Works with Meteor3
- Runs on iOS3
- Great for mobile apps3
- Works with Backbone2
- Works with React2
- Replaces the need for native app development2
- FRP1
Pros of Flux
- Unidirectional data flow44
- Architecture32
- Structure and Data Flow19
- Not MVC14
- Open source12
- Created by facebook6
- A gestalt shift3