Fat-Free vs Laravel vs Node.js

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Fat-Free
Fat-Free

22
24
+ 1
23
Laravel
Laravel

8.5K
5.6K
+ 1
3K
Node.js
Node.js

34.9K
28.8K
+ 1
7.9K

What is Fat-Free?

Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.

What is Laravel?

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

What is Node.js?

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Fat-Free?
Why do developers choose Laravel?
Why do developers choose Node.js?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more consMake informed product decisions

    What companies use Fat-Free?
    What companies use Laravel?
    What companies use Node.js?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Fat-Free?
    What tools integrate with Laravel?
    What tools integrate with Node.js?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Fat-Free, Laravel, and Node.js?
    ASP.NET
    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.
    Rails
    Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.
    Django
    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
    Android SDK
    Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.
    Spring Boot
    Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Fat-Free, Laravel, and Node.js
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Fat-Free, Laravel, and Node.js
    Review ofFat-FreeFat-Free

    This compact framework provided me flexibility. I can implement my own design pattern either MVC or something else. What caught my attention the most was its built-in ORM that can accommodate SQL and NoSql database. That means I can have my MongoSql and SQL queries written by those compatible raw sql statements but still creates ORM models the same way as nosql. Consider for example: $user=new DB\SQL\Mapper($db,'users');// for sql db $user=new DB\Mongo\Mapper($db,'users'); // for mongo db then $user = $user->load('id = 1');

    Thanks to its high modularity, I can add more fat to my liking. There's also Cortex ORM f3 extension which handles join tables. Also, handles sessions, routing, and config with ease and let you organize them neatly. That's just a few of the handful features without much weight and with fast performance. One drawback is smaller community, but didn't disappoint me.

    Review ofLaravelLaravel

    I moved from .NET and Rails to Laravel, and since then never thought to go back. I feel Laravel framework has the capability to overcome all modern frameworks.

    At Soft Pyramid we are developing rich business applications using Laravel Framework, and never feel any limitation even for complex reporting.We have written REST apis, complex ERP solutions and found awsome in all areas.

    Avatar of mihaicracan
    Web Developer, Freelancer
    Review ofNode.jsNode.js

    I have benchmarked Node.js and other popular frameworks using a real life application example. You can find the results here: https://medium.com/@mihaigeorge.c/web-rest-api-benchmark-on-a-real-life-application-ebb743a5d7a3

    How developers use Fat-Free, Laravel, and Node.js
    Avatar of MaxCDN
    MaxCDN uses Node.jsNode.js

    We decided to move the provisioning process to an API-driven process, and had to decide among a few implementation languages:

    • Go, the server-side language from Google
    • NodeJS, an asynchronous framework in Javascript

    We built prototypes in both languages, and decided on NodeJS:

    • NodeJS is asynchronous-by-default, which suited the problem domain. Provisioning is more like “start the job, let me know when you’re done” than a traditional C-style program that’s CPU-bound and needs low-level efficiency.
    • NodeJS acts as an HTTP-based service, so exposing the API was trivial

    Getting into the headspace and internalizing the assumptions of a tool helps pick the right one. NodeJS assumes services will be non-blocking/event-driven and HTTP-accessible, which snapped into our scenario perfectly. The new NodeJS architecture resulted in a staggering 95% reduction in processing time: requests went from 7.5 seconds to under a second.

    Avatar of Trello
    Trello uses Node.jsNode.js

    The server side of Trello is built in Node.js. We knew we wanted instant propagation of updates, which meant that we needed to be able to hold a lot of open connections, so an event-driven, non-blocking server seemed like a good choice. Node also turned out to be an amazing prototyping tool for a single-page app. The prototype version of the Trello server was really just a library of functions that operated on arrays of Models in the memory of a single Node.js process, and the client simply invoked those functions through a very thin wrapper over a WebSocket. This was a very fast way for us to get started trying things out with Trello and making sure that the design was headed in the right direction. We used the prototype version to manage the development of Trello and other internal projects at Fog Creek.