StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Static Web Hosting
  5. Forge vs Webflow

Forge vs Webflow

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webflow
Webflow
Stacks806
Followers839
Votes52
Forge
Forge
Stacks10
Followers24
Votes1

Forge vs Webflow: What are the differences?

Introduction

Forge and Webflow are both website building platforms that offer unique features and functionalities. However, there are several key differences between the two that can help you choose which one suits your needs best.

  1. Hosting and Pricing: Forge offers free hosting for any website built through their platform, whereas Webflow requires users to pay for hosting separately. Additionally, Forge's pricing is more simplified and transparent, while Webflow's pricing structure can be more complex due to various plans and add-ons.

  2. Accessibility and Customization: Forge primarily caters to developers and provides a more code-based approach to website design, allowing for greater customization and flexibility. On the other hand, Webflow is user-friendly for those without coding knowledge, offering a visual design interface that simplifies the website building process.

  3. E-commerce Functionality: Webflow offers integrated e-commerce functionality, allowing users to set up online stores and manage transactions directly on the platform. Forge does not have built-in e-commerce capabilities, requiring users to integrate third-party solutions for online selling.

  4. Community and Support: Webflow has a larger community of users and resources, making it easier to find help, tutorials, and inspiration for website design. Forge, being a newer platform, may have a smaller community, resulting in potentially less support and resources available to users.

In Summary, Forge and Webflow differ in terms of hosting, customization, e-commerce capabilities, and community support, catering to different user needs and preferences in website building.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Webflow
Webflow
Forge
Forge

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Fastest possible way to host lighting-fast static websites for small businesses, web startups, and app developers.

Build responsive websites;PIxel perfect control;Publish and host in minutes
Drag & Drop, or sync with Dropbox or GitHub; Version Based History; Optimized for Speed; Collaborate with Others; Live Site Previews; File differences;
Statistics
Stacks
806
Stacks
10
Followers
839
Followers
24
Votes
52
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Interactions and Animations
  • 7
    Builds clean code in the background
  • 7
    Fast development of html and css layouts/design
  • 6
    Fully Customizable
  • 6
    Free plan
Cons
  • 1
    Freemium
  • 1
    No Audio Support
Pros
  • 1
    Fgfgf
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Dropbox
Dropbox

What are some alternatives to Webflow, Forge?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

GitLab Pages

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Runkod

Runkod

It provides decentralized hosting platform and management tools for modern javascript applications and static web publishing.

BitBalloon

BitBalloon

BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope