Foundation vs. Materialize vs. Pure
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats |
|||||||||
GitHub Stats |
|||||||||
Description |
What is Foundation?Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.
|
What is Materialize?A CSS Framework based on material design.
|
What is Pure?Pure is meant to be a starting point for every website or web app. We take care of all the CSS work that every site needs, without making it look cookie-cutter.
|
||||||
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community! |
|||||||||
Pros |
|
|
|
||||||
Cons |
|
|
|
||||||
Companies |
What companies use Foundation?
756 companies on StackShare use Foundation
|
What companies use Materialize?
58 companies on StackShare use Materialize
|
What companies use Pure?
7 companies on StackShare use Pure
|
||||||
Integrations |
What tools integrate with Foundation?
4 tools on StackShare integrate with Foundation
|
No integrations listed yet
|
No integrations listed yet
|
||||||
What are some alternatives to Foundation, Materialize, and Pure?
|
|||||||||
Latest News |
How Design Insights Transformed Foundation Building ...
May 26, 2017
Foundation Building Blocks: Over 100 Components to J...
April 13, 2017
Foundation & CSS Grid: Think Beyond the Page
March 13, 2017
|
||||||||
Related Comparisons
Interest Over Time
Reviews of Foundation, Materialize, and Pure
-
ConsoleTVsMaterialize Review
January 05, 2015 09:30
I've been using materialize and I'm really happy with it, in some months I'm sure it will become one of the best front-end frameworks around the internet, because it's easy and fast to use and to get started with it.
It also got a nice community of developers that help developing it and finding bugs, as well a translation team, looking to get materialize into the major countries.
My final review is that is one of the best front-end frameworks I've ever found and get used really fast and it's one of the most comfortable frameworks to use as well.
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support -
grigbPretty, but limited (v1.0.0-alpha.3)
February 13, 2018 12:36
As I've been applying Materialize, I've discovered some limitations.
For example, the tabs require ids for the content divs. This makes is difficult to create content dynamically.
The documentation is not accurate.
To use materializecss, you will need to review the source code often.
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support -
grigb
Pretty, but limited (v1.0.0-alpha.3)
February 13, 2018 14:56
As I've been applying Materialize, I've discovered some limitations.
The Glitter page: https://gitter.im/Dogfalo/materialize provided excellent support though. Kudos!
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support -
MathieuMorrissetteAwesome
June 30, 2015 17:21
It is very easy to use. Very good community and documentation :P. Keep up the good work.
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support
How developers use Foundation vs Materialize vs Pure
-
marekgebka uses Foundation
I use it for a lot of professional work where I might need more than just a responsive grid. Has a great set of mixins and components and also some nice JS-modules. I love that its so style-agnostic. Really easy to add custom styling.
-
kfancy uses Foundation
Foundation has been my choice for years over Bootstrap and other similar CSS frameworks due to the naming conventions, well-designed built-in components, and it plays well with React when I'm not using ElementalUI instead.
-
AlexanderSix uses Foundation
My front-end framework of choice. Foundation is super-simple to use for just about anything, and directs my focus always on mobile-first.
-
-
-
nerogit uses Materialize
λΆνΈμ€νΈλ©μ λ무 νν΄μ μ λΉν ννκ³ μ’μκ±° μ°Ύλ€κ° λ°κ²¬
