StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Source Code Management Desktop Apps
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Tower

Gerrit Code Review vs Tower

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tower
Tower
Stacks214
Followers360
Votes80
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Tower: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gerrit Code Review and Tower are popular tools used in the software development process, each offering unique features and functionalities. Here are the key differences between Gerrit Code Review and Tower:

  1. Version Control System Integration: Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed to integrate with Git version control systems, providing a seamless code review process within Git workflows. On the other hand, Tower supports a variety of version control systems including Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, offering flexibility for teams using different VCS.

  2. Workflow Automation: Tower provides a user-friendly interface for managing Git repositories and workflows with easy drag-and-drop capabilities, making it ideal for beginner developers needing a more visual approach. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review focuses on automation and streamlining code review processes, offering a more developer-centric approach with features like code validation and integration testing.

  3. Code Review Process: Gerrit Code Review emphasizes code quality and peer review by enforcing strict rules and policies for code submissions, ensuring that only high-quality code is merged into the repository. Tower, on the other hand, focuses more on collaboration and communication within development teams, offering features like comments, annotations, and notifications to enhance the code review process.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Tower is well-suited for small to medium-sized teams looking for a lightweight and easy-to-use solution for managing their code repositories. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review is highly scalable and designed to handle large codebases and distributed teams, making it ideal for enterprise-level projects with complex review processes.

  5. License and Cost: Gerrit Code Review is an open-source tool, available for free and can be customized to meet specific project requirements. Tower, on the other hand, is a commercial tool with a paid license, offering a more polished and feature-rich solution for teams willing to invest in a premium code review and Git management platform.

  6. Interface and User Experience: Tower provides a visually appealing and intuitive user interface that simplifies the Git workflow, making it easy for developers to navigate and manage their repositories. In comparison, Gerrit Code Review offers a more technical and command-line-based interface that may require a learning curve for users unfamiliar with its specific features and functionalities.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and Tower offer different strengths in version control, workflow automation, code review processes, scalability, licensing, and user experience, catering to a range of development team needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tower
Tower
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Clone & create repos with a click - Manage your GitHub, Bitbucket & Beanstalk accounts from within Tower;Open repos quickly - Tower's "Quick Open" dialog finds and opens repositories in no time;Automate the boring stuff - Fetching and stashing are automatically done for you, if you wish;Clone in the background- Downloading large projects happens in the background, while you work;Multiple windows - Have multiple projects open side-by-side
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
214
Stacks
116
Followers
360
Followers
223
Votes
80
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 19
    Git
  • 16
    Just works
  • 10
    Version control
  • 6
    Simple layout
  • 6
    Awesome
Cons
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Subscription based
  • 1
    No side by side diff
  • 0
    Merge conflict resolution impossible/unclear
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TextMate
TextMate
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Git
Git
Xcode
Xcode
Beanstalk
Beanstalk
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Tower, Gerrit Code Review?

SourceTree

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana