Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ghost vs Symphony CMS: What are the differences?
Developers describe Ghost as "Just a blogging platform". Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do. On the other hand, Symphony CMS is detailed as "XSLT-powered open source content management system". It is a beautifully minimal PHP+MySQL-based open source content management system that uses XML and XSLT as its backbone. On the surface, it is similar in function to ExpressionEngine, Textpattern, WordPress, or Drupal.
Ghost and Symphony CMS can be primarily classified as "Self-Hosted Blogging / CMS" tools.
Ghost is an open source tool with 30.7K GitHub stars and 6.67K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Ghost's open source repository on GitHub.
So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.
Pros of Ghost
- Beautiful44
- Fast34
- Quick/simple post styling29
- Non-profit19
- Live Post Preview19
- Open source18
- Seamless writing16
- Node.js6
- Javascript5
- Fast and Performatic5
- Simplest4
- Wonderful UI3
- Full Control3
- Handlebars3
- Magic2
- Clean2
- Self-hostable1
- Headless CMS1
Pros of Symphony CMS
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ghost
- 110