Gerrit Code Review vs GitKraken

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gerrit Code Review

116
224
+ 1
59
GitKraken

719
909
+ 1
279
Add tool

Gerrit Code Review vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

  1. Workflow Support: Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed for code review workflows, providing a robust platform for team collaboration and code reviews. GitKraken, on the other hand, is primarily focused on providing a visual interface for Git operations, lacking the specialized code review features of Gerrit.
  2. Access Control: Gerrit Code Review offers granular access control capabilities, allowing administrators to define fine-grained permissions for users and branches. This level of control is not as comprehensive in GitKraken, which primarily relies on Git for access control.
  3. Integration with Git: While both Gerrit and GitKraken are built on top of Git, Gerrit is a server-side solution that integrates closely with Git repositories, providing additional features like code review and continuous integration. GitKraken is a client-side application that offers a visual interface for interacting with Git repositories but does not have the same level of deep integration as Gerrit.
  4. Extensibility: Gerrit Code Review can be extended through a robust plugin architecture, allowing users to customize and enhance the platform with additional features and integrations. GitKraken, on the other hand, does not currently offer the same level of extensibility and customization options.
  5. Code Review Process: Gerrit Code Review enforces a strict code review process where changes must be reviewed before being merged into the codebase. GitKraken, while supporting code reviews, does not have the same level of process enforcement as Gerrit.
  6. Web-based Interface: Gerrit Code Review provides a web-based interface for code reviews, making it accessible from any device with an internet connection. GitKraken, while offering a visual interface, is primarily a desktop application and does not have a dedicated web-based interface for code reviews.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and GitKraken differ in their workflow support, access control, integration with Git, extensibility, code review process, and web-based interface.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Gerrit Code Review
Pros of GitKraken
  • 13
    Code review
  • 11
    Good workflow
  • 10
    Cleaner repository story
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 5
    Unlimited repo support
  • 2
    Comparison dashboard
  • 59
    Dark theme
  • 34
    Best linux git client
  • 29
    Great overview
  • 21
    Full featured client
  • 20
    Gitflow support
  • 19
    Beautiful UI
  • 18
    Very easy to use
  • 16
    Graph
  • 13
    Works great on both linux and windows
  • 13
    Effortless
  • 6
    Easy Merge Conflict Tool
  • 5
    Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration
  • 4
    Great UX
  • 3
    Integration with GitHub
  • 3
    Automatic Repo Discovery
  • 3
    Submodule support
  • 3
    Easy to Learn and Setup
  • 3
    Super fast
  • 2
    Fuzzy find (CTRL P)
  • 1
    Very user friendly
  • 1
    Much more stable than source tree
  • 1
    Great for non-dev users
  • 1
    Because it has Linux client
  • 1
    Command palette (CTRL Shift P)

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gerrit Code Review
Cons of GitKraken
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Extremely slow when working with large repositories
    • 3
      No edit/fixup in interactive rebase
    • 3
      Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)
    • 2
      Not as many features as sourcetree
    • 2
      Do not allow to directly edit staging area
    • 2
      Does not work like a Mac app

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Gerrit Code Review?

    Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

    What is GitKraken?

    The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Gerrit Code Review?
    What companies use GitKraken?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Gerrit Code Review or GitKraken.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Gerrit Code Review?
    What tools integrate with GitKraken?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Gerrit Code Review and GitKraken?
    GitHub
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    ESLint
    A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
    Prettier
    Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.
    See all alternatives