StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Go Modules Packages
  5. oauth vs oidc

oauth vs oidc

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

oidc
oidc
Stacks5
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.6K
Forks415
oauth
oauth
Stacks1
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars269
Forks123

oauth vs oidc: What are the differences?

Introduction:
OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) are both authentication and authorization protocols used for secure user authentication in web applications. While both serve similar purposes, they have some key differences that distinguish them from each other.

1. **Protocol Scope**: OAuth 2.0 focuses on authorization, allowing a user to grant a third-party application access to their resources without sharing their credentials. On the other hand, OIDC is an identity layer built on top of OAuth 2.0, providing a standardized way for applications to verify the identity of users based on authentication performed by an authorization server.
   
2. **Token Types**: OAuth 2.0 primarily deals with access tokens, which are used by clients to access protected resources on behalf of the resource owner. In contrast, OIDC introduces ID tokens, JWTs (JSON Web Tokens) containing identity information about the user, in addition to access tokens. These ID tokens help in verifying the user's identity to the client application.

3. **End User Authentication**: OAuth 2.0 does not define how the end-user authentication should be performed, leaving it up to the individual implementations. In OIDC, the authentication process is clearly defined using standardized endpoints and flows, ensuring secure and consistent authentication mechanisms across applications.

4. **User Information**: While OAuth 2.0 does not provide a standard way for clients to retrieve user information, OIDC includes an UserInfo endpoint that allows clients to fetch additional information about the authenticated user, such as their profile data, email address, etc.

5. **Support for Single Sign-On (SSO)**: OIDC inherently supports Single Sign-On (SSO) capabilities, where a user can log in once and access multiple applications without the need to reauthenticate. OAuth 2.0, in its basic form, does not provide SSO functionalities, requiring users to authenticate separately for each application.

6. **Compliance and Security**: OIDC includes additional security features such as signed ID tokens, session management, and logout functionality, making it more suitable for scenarios where security and compliance requirements are critical. OAuth 2.0, while secure when implemented correctly, may not offer the same level of compliance out of the box.

In Summary, OAuth 2.0 primarily focuses on authorization, while OpenID Connect extends OAuth 2.0 to provide authentication and identity verification, offering standardized user information retrieval, user authentication processes, and enhanced security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

oidc
oidc
oauth
oauth

A Go OpenID Connect client.

OAuth 1.0 implementation in go (golang).

Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.6K
GitHub Stars
269
GitHub Forks
415
GitHub Forks
123
Stacks
5
Stacks
1
Followers
1
Followers
0
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to oidc, oauth?

go

go

Google Cloud Client Libraries for Go.

proto

proto

Go support for Google's protocol buffers.

cloudflare

cloudflare

Cloudflare This package provides the package which offers an interface to the CloudFlare gAPI.

net

net

Go supplementary network libraries.

sys

sys

Go packages for low-level interaction with the operating system.

fsnotify

fsnotify

Cross-platform file system notifications for Go.

aws

aws

AWS SDK for the Go programming language.

text

text

Go text processing support.

assertion

assertion

Ginkgo's Preferred Matcher Library.

crypto

crypto

Go supplementary cryptography libraries.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase