Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

swag

292
0
+ 1
0
swaggo/swag

22
2
+ 1
0
Add tool

swag vs swaggo/swag: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the context of software development, there are two main frameworks that facilitate API documentation, namely swaggo and swag. While both frameworks serve a similar purpose, they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Swagger Specification Support: One key difference between swag and swaggo is their support for the Swagger specification. Swag is specifically designed to generate Swagger specification files from Go code, allowing developers to document their APIs using the Swagger format. On the other hand, swaggo is an extension of swag that integrates with Go's code generation tools to automatically generate Swagger documentation from Go annotations.

  2. Code Comment Parsing: Swaggo takes advantage of Go's strong code annotation system to extract relevant documentation information. It parses the code comments of Go structs, functions, and their parameters to generate Swagger documentation, ensuring that the API documentation stays in sync with the actual code implementation. In contrast, swag requires developers to manually annotate their code with additional tags to generate the Swagger specification accurately.

  3. Functionality: Swag provides a more basic set of functionalities compared to swaggo. Swag focuses primarily on generating the Swagger specification file, while swaggo offers a more comprehensive approach by generating the Swagger documentation, creating API handlers based on the specification, and even providing a user interface to interact with the API.

  4. Customization Options: Swaggo offers more customization options compared to swag. With swaggo, developers can specify additional configurations using annotations, such as customizing API responses or configuring middleware. Swag, on the other hand, has limited customization options and mainly relies on the annotations provided by swaggo.

  5. Third-Party Tool Integration: Swaggo provides integration with popular third-party tools like Gin, a web framework for Go, and other frameworks like Echo and Chi. This makes it easier for developers using these frameworks to generate Swagger documentation seamlessly. Swag, however, is not directly integrated with any specific third-party tool.

  6. Community and Support: Swaggo has a more active community and offers better support compared to swag. The swaggo GitHub repository is frequently updated with bug fixes and new features, and there is an active community forum where developers can seek help and discuss issues. Swag, on the other hand, has limited support and is not actively maintained.

In summary, the key differences between swag and swaggo include their approach to the Swagger specification support, code comment parsing, functionality, customization options, third-party tool integration, and community support.

swag Stats
  • Dependent Packages Counts - 0
swaggo/swag Stats
  • Dependent Packages Counts - 0
swag Release info
Latest version
0.22.3
Apache-2.0
swaggo/swag Release info
Latest version
2.0.0
MIT

What is swag?

Goodie bag in use in the go-openapi projects.

What is swaggo/swag?

Automatically generate RESTful API documentation with Swagger 2.0 for Go.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use swag?
What companies use swaggo/swag?
    No companies found
    See which teams inside your own company are using swag or swaggo/swag.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to swag and swaggo/swag?
    go
    Google Cloud Client Libraries for Go.
    proto
    Go support for Google's protocol buffers.
    cloudflare
    Cloudflare This package provides the package which offers an interface to the CloudFlare gAPI.
    aws
    AWS SDK for the Go programming language.
    assertion
    Ginkgo's Preferred Matcher Library.
    See all alternatives