GoInstant vs Socket.IO

Overview

GoInstant

Stacks0

Followers3

Votes14

Socket.IO

Stacks13.6K

Followers11.0K

Votes776

GoInstant vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

<GoInstant vs. Socket.IO>

1. **Real-time Capabilities**: GoInstant is specifically designed for real-time data synchronization across multiple clients in a collaborative environment, making it ideal for interactive applications. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a more versatile library that can handle real-time communication, but it may not offer the same level of synchronization and collaboration features as GoInstant.

2. **Scalability**: GoInstant provides built-in scalability features, such as automatic data partitioning and load balancing, to ensure robust performance even with a large number of concurrent users. In contrast, Socket.IO may require additional configurations or third-party services to achieve the same level of scalability.

3. **Data Persistence**: GoInstant includes data persistence capabilities, allowing data to be stored and retrieved even when clients are offline. In comparison, while Socket.IO can facilitate real-time communication, it may not offer the same level of data persistence without additional implementations.

4. **Authentication and Security**: GoInstant provides secure authentication mechanisms and built-in security features to protect data transmission and ensure data privacy. Socket.IO may require additional security measures to achieve a similar level of protection for real-time communication.

5. **Integration and Ecosystem**: GoInstant offers a comprehensive ecosystem with additional tools and services for developers to integrate and enhance their applications. Socket.IO, while popular and widely used, may require more customization and third-party extensions for specific integration needs.

6. **Cost and Licensing**: The pricing model and licensing terms for GoInstant and Socket.IO may differ significantly, impacting the overall cost of using these technologies in a production environment.

In Summary, GoInstant and Socket.IO differ in their real-time capabilities, scalability, data persistence, authentication and security, integration ecosystem, and cost considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GoInstant, Socket.IO

Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Node.js

ExpressJS

React

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M

Comments

Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GoInstant	Socket.IO
It is a service for building web and mobile realtime apps easily. Simply add its library to your application to gain access to shared data storage, pub/sub messaging and more.	It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.
Shared data storage; Pub/sub messaging; REST API; Client-side widgets; Angular integration (GoAngular)	Real-time analytics - Push data to clients that gets represented as real-time counters, charts or logs.;Binary streaming - Starting in 1.0, it's possible to send any blob back and forth: image, audio, video.;Instant messaging and chat - Socket.IO's "Hello world" is a chat app in just a few lines of code.;Document collaboration - Allow users to concurrently edit a document and see each other's changes.
Statistics
Stacks 0	Stacks 13.6K
Followers 3	Followers 11.0K
Votes 14	Votes 776
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Client side only applications without server hassle 4 Easy to integrate 2 Great documentation 1 Great AngularJS adapter 1 Great support	Pros 219 Real-time 143 Node.js 141 Event-based communication 102 WebSockets 102 Open source Cons 12 Bad documentation 4 Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated 3 Doesn't work on React Native 2 Small community 2 Websocket Errors
Integrations
Postman GitHub Rekognition API	Auth0 Gatsby Flutter React Backbone.js Cloud Firestore Outbrain

What are some alternatives to GoInstant, Socket.IO?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

GoInstant vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

<GoInstant vs. Socket.IO>

1. **Real-time Capabilities**: GoInstant is specifically designed for real-time data synchronization across multiple clients in a collaborative environment, making it ideal for interactive applications. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a more versatile library that can handle real-time communication, but it may not offer the same level of synchronization and collaboration features as GoInstant.

2. **Scalability**: GoInstant provides built-in scalability features, such as automatic data partitioning and load balancing, to ensure robust performance even with a large number of concurrent users. In contrast, Socket.IO may require additional configurations or third-party services to achieve the same level of scalability.

3. **Data Persistence**: GoInstant includes data persistence capabilities, allowing data to be stored and retrieved even when clients are offline. In comparison, while Socket.IO can facilitate real-time communication, it may not offer the same level of data persistence without additional implementations.

4. **Authentication and Security**: GoInstant provides secure authentication mechanisms and built-in security features to protect data transmission and ensure data privacy. Socket.IO may require additional security measures to achieve a similar level of protection for real-time communication.

5. **Integration and Ecosystem**: GoInstant offers a comprehensive ecosystem with additional tools and services for developers to integrate and enhance their applications. Socket.IO, while popular and widely used, may require more customization and third-party extensions for specific integration needs.

6. **Cost and Licensing**: The pricing model and licensing terms for GoInstant and Socket.IO may differ significantly, impacting the overall cost of using these technologies in a production environment.

In Summary, GoInstant and Socket.IO differ in their real-time capabilities, scalability, data persistence, authentication and security, integration ecosystem, and cost considerations.

GoInstant vs Socket.IO

Overview