Google Cloud Bigtable vs Kafka Manager

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Cloud Bigtable

101
265
+ 1
21
Kafka Manager

62
131
+ 1
1
Add tool

Google Cloud Bigtable vs Kafka Manager: What are the differences?

Developers describe Google Cloud Bigtable as "The same database that powers Google Search, Gmail and Analytics". Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail. On the other hand, Kafka Manager is detailed as "A tool for managing Apache Kafka, developed by Yahoo". This interface makes it easier to identify topics which are unevenly distributed across the cluster or have partition leaders unevenly distributed across the cluster. It supports management of multiple clusters, preferred replica election, replica re-assignment, and topic creation. It is also great for getting a quick bird’s eye view of the cluster.

Google Cloud Bigtable can be classified as a tool in the "NoSQL Database as a Service" category, while Kafka Manager is grouped under "Message Queue".

Some of the features offered by Google Cloud Bigtable are:

  • Unmatched Performance: Single-digit millisecond latency and over 2X the performance per dollar of unmanaged NoSQL alternatives.
  • Open Source Interface: Because Cloud Bigtable is accessed through the HBase API, it is natively integrated with much of the existing big data and Hadoop ecosystem and supports Google’s big data products. Additionally, data can be imported from or exported to existing HBase clusters through simple bulk ingestion tools using industry-standard formats.
  • Low Cost: By providing a fully managed service and exceptional efficiency, Cloud Bigtable’s total cost of ownership is less than half the cost of its direct competition.

On the other hand, Kafka Manager provides the following key features:

  • Manage multiple clusters
  • Easy inspection of cluster state (topics, brokers, replica distribution, partition distribution)
  • Run preferred replica election

Kafka Manager is an open source tool with 7.45K GitHub stars and 1.82K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Kafka Manager's open source repository on GitHub.

Spotify, Resultados Digitais, and Rainist are some of the popular companies that use Google Cloud Bigtable, whereas Kafka Manager is used by Yahoo!, IgnitionOne, and Ocado Technology. Google Cloud Bigtable has a broader approval, being mentioned in 17 company stacks & 3 developers stacks; compared to Kafka Manager, which is listed in 8 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Google Cloud Bigtable
Pros of Kafka Manager
  • 8
    Fully managed
  • 8
    High performance
  • 5
    High scalability
  • 1
    Better Insights for Kafka cluster

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Google Cloud Bigtable?

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

What is Kafka Manager?

This interface makes it easier to identify topics which are unevenly distributed across the cluster or have partition leaders unevenly distributed across the cluster. It supports management of multiple clusters, preferred replica election, replica re-assignment, and topic creation. It is also great for getting a quick bird’s eye view of the cluster.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Google Cloud Bigtable?
What companies use Kafka Manager?
See which teams inside your own company are using Google Cloud Bigtable or Kafka Manager.
Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Google Cloud Bigtable?
What tools integrate with Kafka Manager?
What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Bigtable and Kafka Manager?
Google Cloud Datastore
Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.
Microsoft Access
It is an easy-to-use tool for creating business applications, from templates or from scratch. With its rich and intuitive design tools, it can help you create appealing and highly functional applications in a minimal amount of time.
Google Cloud Spanner
It is a globally distributed database service that gives developers a production-ready storage solution. It provides key features such as global transactions, strongly consistent reads, and automatic multi-site replication and failover.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.
See all alternatives