Azure Database for MySQL vs Google Cloud SQL

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Database for MySQL

40
106
+ 1
0
Google Cloud SQL

543
571
+ 1
46
Add tool

Azure Database for MySQL vs Google Cloud SQL: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Storage Option: Azure Database for MySQL offers storage options such as general-purpose and memory-optimized tiers for better performance and scalability. In contrast, Google Cloud SQL provides storage options based on Solid-State Drives (SSD) only, offering high-performance storage with costs varying with storage size.

  2. Pricing Model: Azure Database for MySQL offers a flexible pricing model based on the resources consumed, including options for auto-scaling and serverless configurations. On the other hand, Google Cloud SQL follows a predictable pricing model based on the type and size of the instance chosen, with additional fees for features like high availability and automatic backups.

  3. High Availability: Azure Database for MySQL offers high availability with automated backups, automated patching, and geo-replication across multiple data centers. In comparison, Google Cloud SQL provides high availability with an automatic failover feature, but lacks cross-region replicas for enhanced disaster recovery.

  4. Compatibility: Azure Database for MySQL supports MySQL community and enterprise editions, along with tools like MySQL Workbench and phpMyAdmin for database management. In contrast, Google Cloud SQL fully managed service supports MySQL and PostgreSQL databases with built-in tools for monitoring and performance optimization.

  5. Security Features: Azure Database for MySQL offers advanced security features such as Virtual Network service endpoints, transparent data encryption, and threat detection for improved compliance and data protection. Meanwhile, Google Cloud SQL provides security features like SSL encryption, IAM role-based access control, and Cloud Audit Logs for monitoring and governance.

  6. Integration: Azure Database for MySQL integrates seamlessly with other Azure services like Azure Virtual Machines, Azure Functions, and Azure Active Directory for streamlined application development and access management. On the other hand, Google Cloud SQL integrates with Google Cloud Platform services, Google Kubernetes Engine, and Cloud Functions for building robust and scalable cloud-based applications.

In Summary, Azure Database for MySQL and Google Cloud SQL differ in storage options, pricing models, high availability capabilities, database compatibility, security features, and integration capabilities.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Azure Database for MySQL
Pros of Google Cloud SQL
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 13
      Fully managed
    • 10
      Backed by Google
    • 10
      SQL
    • 4
      Flexible
    • 3
      Encryption at rest and transit
    • 3
      Automatic Software Patching
    • 3
      Replication across multiple zone by default

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Azure Database for MySQL?

    Azure Database for MySQL provides a managed database service for app development and deployment that allows you to stand up a MySQL database in minutes and scale on the fly – on the cloud you trust most.

    What is Google Cloud SQL?

    Run the same relational databases you know with their rich extension collections, configuration flags and developer ecosystem, but without the hassle of self management.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Azure Database for MySQL?
    What companies use Google Cloud SQL?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Azure Database for MySQL or Google Cloud SQL.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Azure Database for MySQL?
    What tools integrate with Google Cloud SQL?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Azure Database for MySQL and Google Cloud SQL?
    Azure SQL Database
    It is the intelligent, scalable, cloud database service that provides the broadest SQL Server engine compatibility and up to a 212% return on investment. It is a database service that can quickly and efficiently scale to meet demand, is automatically highly available, and supports a variety of third party software.
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    Amazon RDS
    Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.
    Amazon Aurora
    Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.
    Cloud DB for Mysql
    It is a fully managed cloud cache service that enables you to easily configure a MySQL database with a few settings and clicks and operate it reliably with NAVER's optimization settings, and that automatically recovers from failures.
    See all alternatives