Google Cloud Storage vs Rackspace Cloud Files

Overview

Rackspace Cloud Files

Stacks63

Followers67

Votes25

Google Cloud Storage

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.2K

Votes75

Google Cloud Storage vs Rackspace Cloud Files: What are the differences?

Developers describe Google Cloud Storage as "Durable and highly available object storage service". Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure. On the other hand, Rackspace Cloud Files is detailed as "Store it on Cloud Files, serve it fast on Akamai's CDN". Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Google Cloud Storage and Rackspace Cloud Files can be primarily classified as "Cloud Storage" tools.

Some of the features offered by Google Cloud Storage are:

High Capacity and Scalability
Strong Data Consistency
Google Developers Console Projects

On the other hand, Rackspace Cloud Files provides the following key features:

Pay as you grow pricing starting at 10¢/GB/Mo.
Akamai CDN delivery of your content starting at 12¢/GB
Use as much or as little storage as you want

"Scalable" is the top reason why over 22 developers like Google Cloud Storage, while over 4 developers mention "Akamai CDN" as the leading cause for choosing Rackspace Cloud Files.

Accenture, Evernote, and Teleport are some of the popular companies that use Google Cloud Storage, whereas Rackspace Cloud Files is used by Accenture, Utrip, and RecordSetter. Google Cloud Storage has a broader approval, being mentioned in 183 company stacks & 79 developers stacks; compared to Rackspace Cloud Files, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 10 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Rackspace Cloud Files, Google Cloud Storage

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rackspace Cloud Files	Google Cloud Storage
Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).	Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.
Pay as you grow pricing starting at 10¢/GB/Mo.;Akamai CDN delivery of your content starting at 12¢/GB;Use as much or as little storage as you want;Store files and media of any size;Highly scalable, redundant online storage;Cloud Files is built with OpenStack technology;No long-term contracts;RESTful API enables developer access;Cloud Files is Powered by OpenStack;Cloud Files with Akamai CDN;Mix 'n Match Compute Platforms with RackConnect	High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing
Statistics
Stacks 63	Stacks 2.0K
Followers 67	Followers 1.2K
Votes 25	Votes 75
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Akamai CDN 5 Inexpensive and pay-as-you-go 4 Simple file upload 3 Simple scaling 2 Huge time-saver	Pros 28 Scalable 19 Cheap 14 Reliable 9 Easy 3 Chealp

What are some alternatives to Rackspace Cloud Files, Google Cloud Storage?

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Google Cloud Storage are:

High Capacity and Scalability
Strong Data Consistency
Google Developers Console Projects

On the other hand, Rackspace Cloud Files provides the following key features:

Pay as you grow pricing starting at 10¢/GB/Mo.
Akamai CDN delivery of your content starting at 12¢/GB
Use as much or as little storage as you want

"Scalable" is the top reason why over 22 developers like Google Cloud Storage, while over 4 developers mention "Akamai CDN" as the leading cause for choosing Rackspace Cloud Files.

Google Cloud Storage vs Rackspace Cloud Files