LocalStack vs λ Gordon

Overview

λ Gordon

Stacks0

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.0K

Forks137

LocalStack

Stacks57

Followers136

Votes33

LocalStack vs λ Gordon: What are the differences?

Deployment Scope: LocalStack focuses on emulating a local AWS cloud environment, allowing developers to test their applications locally without the need for internet connectivity. On the other hand, λ Gordon primarily focuses on serverless deployments to AWS cloud environments, aiding developers in managing and deploying serverless applications on AWS.
Cost Management: LocalStack is free to use and is an open-source project, making it a cost-effective option for developers looking to simulate AWS functionalities locally. Conversely, λ Gordon may incur costs depending on the AWS services and resources utilized during deployment, making it important for users to monitor and manage their AWS spending.
Integration Capabilities: LocalStack provides a wide range of AWS service emulations for local testing and development purposes, making it a comprehensive tool for mimicking AWS environments. In comparison, λ Gordon offers streamlined integration specifically tailored for serverless deployments, with features such as automatic CloudFormation generation and Lambda deployment simplifying the process for developers.
Community Support: LocalStack has a robust community of developers contributing to its ongoing development and enhancement, providing users with a rich pool of resources and support. On the other hand, λ Gordon, while actively maintained and supported by its creators, may have a more focused community due to its specific serverless deployment functionality.
Learning Curve: LocalStack can be easier for developers already familiar with AWS services, as it mirrors many of the functionalities and interfaces present in the actual AWS environment. Meanwhile, λ Gordon may have a steeper learning curve for those new to serverless deployments, requiring some time to understand its optimized workflows and deployment processes.
Monitoring and Debugging: LocalStack offers debugging capabilities and visibility into local AWS service interactions, allowing developers to troubleshoot issues effectively during testing. In contrast, λ Gordon provides monitoring features tailored for serverless applications deployed on AWS, enabling users to track performance metrics and troubleshoot issues specific to serverless architectures.

In Summary, LocalStack primarily focuses on emulating a local AWS environment for testing, whereas λ Gordon specializes in serverless deployments to AWS cloud environments, offering streamlined integration and monitoring features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

λ Gordon	LocalStack
Gordon is a tool to create, wire and deploy AWS Lambdas using CloudFormation	LocalStack provides an easy-to-use test/mocking framework for developing Cloud applications.
100% CloudFormation resource creation;100% Boilerplate free;100% isolated and dead-simple multi-stage and multi region deployments;Python/Javascript/Java/Golang/Scala... runtimes supported.;Run Lambdas locally (Python/Javascript/Java/Golang/Scala...);Simple yml configuration;Seamless integration with (pip,npm, gradle, ...);100% Customizable lambda build process. Use Docker, Makefile or... a simple shell script.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 137	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 0	Stacks 57
Followers 19	Followers 136
Votes 0	Votes 33
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 4 Integration with Python/nosetests 4 No dependency on cloud 4 Local/offline testing 3 Available as Docker image 3 The correct URL is https://github.com/localstack/locals Cons 2 Doesn't work well on Windows 1 No proper admin panel/web UI
Integrations
AWS Lambda AWS CloudFormation	Amazon Kinesis Firehose Amazon Redshift Amazon S3 Amazon SQS Amazon SNS Amazon Kinesis Amazon API Gateway AWS Lambda Amazon Elasticsearch Service

What are some alternatives to λ Gordon, LocalStack?

AWS Amplify

A JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends.

awless

awless is a fast, powerful and easy-to-use command line interface (CLI) to manage Amazon Web Services.

AWS CLI

It is a unified tool to manage your AWS services. With just one tool to download and configure, you can control multiple AWS services from the command line and automate them through scripts.

Bash-My-AWS

It is a simple but extremely powerful set of CLI commands for managing resources on Amazon Web Services. They harness the power of Amazon's AWSCLI, while abstracting away verbosity. The project implements some innovative patterns but (arguably) remains simple, beautiful and readable.

AWS Shell

The AWS Command Line Interface is a unified tool to manage your AWS services.

troposphere

The troposphere library allows for easier creation of the AWS CloudFormation JSON by writing Python code to describe the AWS resources. troposphere also includes some basic support for OpenStack resources via Heat.

AWS Systems Manager

It is a secure end-to-end management solution for hybrid cloud environments. It centralizes operational data from multiple AWS services and automates tasks across your AWS resources. You can create logical groups of resources such as applications, different layers of an application stack, or production versus development environments.

AWS Organizations

It lets you create new AWS accounts at no additional charge. With accounts in an organization, you can easily allocate resources, group accounts, and apply governance policies to accounts or groups.

Vantage

It is an alternative to the AWS console focused on developer experience and cost transparency. It is meant to work alongside your existing automation tools.

AWS Trusted Advisor

It provides recommendations that help you follow AWS best practices. Trusted Advisor evaluates your account by using checks. These checks identify ways to optimize your AWS infrastructure, improve security and performance, reduce costs, and monitor service quotas. You can then follow the recommendations to optimize your services and resources.

Related Comparisons

LocalStack vs λ Gordon: What are the differences?

Deployment Scope: LocalStack focuses on emulating a local AWS cloud environment, allowing developers to test their applications locally without the need for internet connectivity. On the other hand, λ Gordon primarily focuses on serverless deployments to AWS cloud environments, aiding developers in managing and deploying serverless applications on AWS.
Cost Management: LocalStack is free to use and is an open-source project, making it a cost-effective option for developers looking to simulate AWS functionalities locally. Conversely, λ Gordon may incur costs depending on the AWS services and resources utilized during deployment, making it important for users to monitor and manage their AWS spending.
Integration Capabilities: LocalStack provides a wide range of AWS service emulations for local testing and development purposes, making it a comprehensive tool for mimicking AWS environments. In comparison, λ Gordon offers streamlined integration specifically tailored for serverless deployments, with features such as automatic CloudFormation generation and Lambda deployment simplifying the process for developers.
Community Support: LocalStack has a robust community of developers contributing to its ongoing development and enhancement, providing users with a rich pool of resources and support. On the other hand, λ Gordon, while actively maintained and supported by its creators, may have a more focused community due to its specific serverless deployment functionality.
Learning Curve: LocalStack can be easier for developers already familiar with AWS services, as it mirrors many of the functionalities and interfaces present in the actual AWS environment. Meanwhile, λ Gordon may have a steeper learning curve for those new to serverless deployments, requiring some time to understand its optimized workflows and deployment processes.
Monitoring and Debugging: LocalStack offers debugging capabilities and visibility into local AWS service interactions, allowing developers to troubleshoot issues effectively during testing. In contrast, λ Gordon provides monitoring features tailored for serverless applications deployed on AWS, enabling users to track performance metrics and troubleshoot issues specific to serverless architectures.

LocalStack vs λ Gordon

Overview