Buck vs Gradle

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Buck

27
146
+ 1
8
Gradle

16.9K
9.5K
+ 1
254
Add tool

Buck vs Gradle: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Language Support: One key difference between Buck and Gradle is the language support they offer. Buck is primarily designed for building projects written in Java, Android, and C/C++, whereas Gradle supports a wider range of languages including Java, Kotlin, Groovy, Scala, and more.
  2. 2. Build Speed: Another major difference lies in the build speed of these build systems. Buck is known for its fast and efficient incremental builds, as it only rebuilds the necessary dependencies. On the other hand, Gradle may suffer from slower build times, especially for large projects, due to its more generic and flexible model.
  3. 3. Configuration Style: Buck and Gradle also differ in their configuration styles. Buck uses a declarative approach, where users define the build rules explicitly in a Buck configuration file. In contrast, Gradle uses a more flexible and imperative DSL (Domain Specific Language) that allows users to write build scripts with extensive customization.
  4. 4. Build Caching: When it comes to build caching, Buck and Gradle have different mechanisms. Buck has built-in support for caching build artifacts, dependencies, and intermediate build results. This helps to significantly reduce the build time by reusing previously built components. Gradle, on the other hand, requires additional plugins or configuration to enable build caching.
  5. 5. Dependency Management: Buck and Gradle also vary in their approach to dependency management. Buck uses a more explicit and strict mechanism, where dependencies are explicitly declared in the build configuration files. Gradle, on the other hand, provides a more sophisticated and flexible dependency management system, including transitive dependency resolution and support for multiple repositories.
  6. 6. Parallel Execution: Lastly, Buck and Gradle differ in their parallel execution capabilities. Buck is known for its efficient parallelization, where it can execute multiple tasks in parallel, leveraging the dependency graph and avoiding unnecessary sequential steps. Gradle, although it also supports parallel execution, may not utilize it as optimally as Buck due to its more flexible and complex build model.

In Summary, Buck and Gradle differ in language support, build speed, configuration style, build caching, dependency management, and parallel execution.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Buck
Pros of Gradle
  • 4
    Fast
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Facebook
  • 1
    Runs on OSX
  • 1
    Windows Support
  • 110
    Flexibility
  • 51
    Easy to use
  • 47
    Groovy dsl
  • 22
    Slow build time
  • 10
    Crazy memory leaks
  • 8
    Fast incremental builds
  • 5
    Kotlin DSL
  • 1
    Windows Support

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Buck
Cons of Gradle
  • 2
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Learning Curve
  • 8
    Inactionnable documentation
  • 6
    It is just the mess of Ant++
  • 4
    Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal
  • 2
    Bad Eclipse tooling
  • 2
    Dependency on groovy

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Buck?

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

What is Gradle?

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Buck?
What companies use Gradle?
See which teams inside your own company are using Buck or Gradle.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Buck?
What tools integrate with Gradle?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Buck and Gradle?
Bazel
Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.
CMake
It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.
Apache Maven
Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
Sonatype Nexus
It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies
JFrog Artifactory
It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
See all alternatives