StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hadoop vs Lucene

Hadoop vs Lucene

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
Lucene
Lucene
Stacks175
Followers230
Votes2

Hadoop vs Lucene: What are the differences?

Hadoop and Lucene are both widely used technologies in the field of Big Data and data analytics. While they serve different purposes, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.
  1. Data Processing Mechanism: Hadoop is a distributed data processing framework that enables large-scale data processing using a cluster of computers. It utilizes a distributed file system called Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) and a processing framework called MapReduce. On the other hand, Lucene is a full-text search library that provides indexing and searching capabilities to retrieve information from unstructured or semi-structured data.

  2. Data Storage: Hadoop stores data in a distributed manner across a cluster of computers, allowing high availability and fault tolerance. It breaks down large files into smaller blocks and replicates them across different nodes. In contrast, Lucene does not store data in a distributed manner. It uses its index structure to store and retrieve data efficiently within a single machine.

  3. Scalability: Hadoop is highly scalable and can handle large volumes of data by simply adding more nodes to the cluster. It can scale horizontally by adding more commodity hardware, achieving high throughput and processing power. Lucene, on the other hand, is not designed to scale horizontally like Hadoop. It is more suitable for smaller datasets and can run on a single machine or a small cluster of machines.

  4. Data Processing Paradigm: Hadoop follows the MapReduce paradigm, which involves dividing the data into smaller chunks and processing them in parallel across different nodes. It is well-suited for batch processing and analyzing large datasets. In contrast, Lucene employs an inverted index mechanism to enable efficient searching and retrieval of information. It is optimized for real-time search and indexing, making it ideal for applications that require quick search capabilities.

  5. Data Accessibility: Hadoop provides a distributed file system (HDFS) that allows data to be accessed and processed by multiple concurrent tasks or applications. It provides a shared storage space for various data processing jobs. On the other hand, Lucene indexes data within its own structured file format, making it accessible only to the application using the Lucene library.

  6. Use Cases: Hadoop is commonly used for big data processing, including tasks like log analysis, data warehousing, and large-scale data analytics. It is suitable for scenarios where handling large volumes of data is essential. Lucene, on the other hand, is primarily used for text search and information retrieval. It is widely used in applications like web search engines, document search, and recommendation systems.

In Summary, Hadoop is a distributed data processing framework designed for handling large-scale data processing and analytics, while Lucene is a full-text search library optimized for efficient searching and retrieval of information from unstructured or semi-structured data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
Lucene
Lucene

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

Lucene Core, our flagship sub-project, provides Java-based indexing and search technology, as well as spellchecking, hit highlighting and advanced analysis/tokenization capabilities.

-
over 150GB/hour on modern hardware;small RAM requirements -- only 1MB heap;incremental indexing as fast as batch indexing;index size roughly 20-30% the size of text indexed;ranked searching -- best results returned first;many powerful query types: phrase queries, wildcard queries, proximity queries, range queries;fielded searching (e.g. title, author, contents);sorting by any field;multiple-index searching with merged results;allows simultaneous update and searching;flexible faceting, highlighting, joins and result grouping;fast, memory-efficient and typo-tolerant suggesters;pluggable ranking models, including the Vector Space Model and Okapi BM25;configurable storage engine (codecs)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
175
Followers
2.3K
Followers
230
Votes
56
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
Pros
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Small
Integrations
No integrations available
Solr
Solr
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, Lucene?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase