Hanami vs Padrino: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Philosophy and Design Approach: Hanami follows a more opinionated design approach with strong conventions and guidelines, while Padrino offers more flexibility and does not enforce strict conventions, allowing developers to make their own choices regarding architecture and design patterns.
2. Modular Architecture: Hanami is designed as a collection of independent modules that can be used individually, promoting better code reusability, while Padrino provides a more monolithic structure with all components tightly integrated, which may lead to a higher level of coupling between different parts of the application.
3. ORM Integration: Hanami comes with its own ORM called Hanami Model, which is tightly integrated with the framework, providing seamless data manipulation functionalities, whereas Padrino supports various ORMs, allowing developers to choose the one that best fits their needs, giving them more flexibility in database interactions.
4. Middleware Stack: Hanami uses Rack for its middleware stack, providing a well-established and reliable infrastructure to manage HTTP requests and responses, whereas Padrino has its middleware layer, which is lighter in terms of functionality but allows for more customization and control over the HTTP pipeline.
5. Community and Support: Hanami has a smaller but more focused community, with dedicated contributors actively improving the framework and providing comprehensive documentation, whereas Padrino has a larger community with a wider range of plugins and extensions available, but may lack the same level of focus and depth in documentation and support resources.

In Summary, Hanami and Padrino differ in their philosophy, architecture, ORM integration, middleware stack, and community support.