Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

HAProxy

2.4K
2.1K
+ 1
562
Squid

104
204
+ 1
17
Add tool

HAProxy vs Squid: What are the differences?

HAProxy is a high-performance, open-source TCP/HTTP load balancer known for its reliability and advanced features, while Squid is a caching proxy server primarily used for web content caching and filtering. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Load Balancing vs. Caching: HAProxy is primarily designed for load balancing, distributing incoming network traffic across multiple servers to ensure high availability and scalability. On the other hand, Squid focuses on caching web content, storing frequently accessed data to improve performance and reduce bandwidth usage.

  2. Layer 4 and Layer 7: HAProxy operates at both Layer 4 (Transport layer) and Layer 7 (Application layer) of the OSI model, allowing it to make load balancing decisions based on various factors such as IP addresses, TCP/UDP ports, and HTTP request headers. Squid, however, functions at Layer 7 only, offering more intelligent caching and web content filtering capabilities.

  3. Protocol Support: HAProxy supports a wide range of protocols such as HTTP, TCP, SSL/TLS, WebSocket, and more, making it suitable for load balancing various types of traffic. In contrast, Squid specializes in HTTP and HTTPS protocols, excelling in caching web content for HTTP-based applications.

  4. Reverse Proxy Capabilities: Both HAProxy and Squid can act as reverse proxies, handling requests from clients and forwarding them to appropriate backend servers. However, HAProxy is more commonly used as a reverse proxy due to its strong load balancing capabilities, whereas Squid is preferred for caching and filtering purposes.

  5. Performance and Scalability: HAProxy is known for its exceptional performance and scalability, capable of handling high loads and thousands of concurrent connections. It leverages event-driven architecture and multicore processors efficiently. While Squid also provides good performance, it may not scale as well as HAProxy in extremely high traffic scenarios.

  6. Configuration and Flexibility: HAProxy uses a simple configuration language with a wide range of options, giving administrators fine-grained control over load balancing behavior. Squid, on the other hand, utilizes a more complex configuration syntax, mainly focused on caching rules and policies.

In summary, HAProxy is a powerful load balancer that excels in distributing traffic across servers, offering extensive protocol support and scalability. Squid, on the other hand, is a versatile caching proxy, specializing in caching web content and providing filtering capabilities. Both tools serve different purposes in the web application delivery ecosystem.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of HAProxy
Pros of Squid
  • 132
    Load balancer
  • 102
    High performance
  • 69
    Very fast
  • 58
    Proxying for tcp and http
  • 55
    SSL termination
  • 31
    Open source
  • 27
    Reliable
  • 20
    Free
  • 18
    Well-Documented
  • 12
    Very popular
  • 7
    Runs health checks on backends
  • 7
    Suited for very high traffic web sites
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 5
    Ready to Docker
  • 4
    Powers many world's most visited sites
  • 3
    Simple
  • 2
    Ssl offloading
  • 2
    Work with NTLM
  • 1
    Available as a plugin for OPNsense
  • 1
    Redis
  • 4
    Easy to config
  • 2
    Web application accelerator
  • 2
    Cluster
  • 2
    Very Fast
  • 1
    ICP
  • 1
    High-performance
  • 1
    Very Stable
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Widely Used
  • 1
    Great community
  • 1
    ESI
  • 0
    Qq

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of HAProxy
Cons of Squid
  • 6
    Becomes your single point of failure
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is HAProxy?

    HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

    What is Squid?

    Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use HAProxy?
    What companies use Squid?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with HAProxy?
    What tools integrate with Squid?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitGitHubSlack+30
    27
    18650
    DockerSlackAmazon EC2+17
    18
    6019
    GitHubMySQLSlack+44
    109
    50743
    What are some alternatives to HAProxy and Squid?
    NGINX
    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
    Traefik
    A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.
    Envoy
    Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
    Varnish
    Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.
    Pound
    Pound was developed to enable distributing the load among several Web-servers and to allow for a convenient SSL wrapper for those Web servers that do not offer it natively.
    See all alternatives