MongoDB vs. SQLite vs. Hazelcast

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Heads up: you're comparing apples to oranges. Tools belonging to different groups are often not directly comparable because they usually have different intended purposes and benefits.

MongoDB

SQLite

Hazelcast

Favorites

402

Favorites

66

Favorites

8

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 623
  • 542
  • 97.8K
  • 3.74K
  • 5.58K
  • 60.7K
  • -
  • 14
  • 1.59K

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is MongoDB?

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

What is SQLite?

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

What is Hazelcast?

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Pros about this tool

Why do you like MongoDB?

Why do you like SQLite?

Why do you like Hazelcast?

Cons about this tool

Pricing

Hazelcast Pricing

Customers

Integrations

Latest News

This Week in Data with Colin Charles 28: Percona Liv...
Performing a Live Migration from a MongoDB Cluster t...
MongoDB’s Drive to Multi-Document Transactions
orchestrator 3.0.2 GA released: raft consensus, SQLite
Using Active Record migrations beyond SQLite
Spring Integration Extension for Hazelcast 1.0.0 GA ...
Build a Spring Boot API with Hazelcast for Cached Us...


Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these