Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache Impala

145
300
+ 1
18
Pig

59
111
+ 1
5
Add tool

Apache Impala vs Pig: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache Impala and Pig

Apache Impala and Pig are both popular tools used for data processing in the big data ecosystem. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Syntax: Pig uses a high-level scripting language called Pig Latin, which is similar to SQL but also incorporates data processing functions. On the other hand, Impala uses a SQL-like syntax that provides a more familiar interface for SQL users.

  2. Execution: Pig is an interpreted language that runs on top of the Hadoop framework, which means it can be slower compared to Impala. Impala, on the other hand, is a distributed SQL engine that can provide faster query execution by bypassing the Hadoop MapReduce layer.

  3. Data Storage: Pig is typically used for processing data stored in Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), but it can also work with other storage systems. Impala is designed specifically for querying data stored in Hadoop distributed file systems like HDFS or Apache HBase.

  4. Schema Definition: Pig is schema-on-read, which means it does not enforce strict data schemas. It can handle semi-structured or unstructured data formats. Impala, on the other hand, is schema-on-write, which requires a predefined schema for the data before it is stored.

  5. Data Types: Pig supports a wide range of data types, including complex data types like maps and tuples. Impala also supports various data types but has a more limited range compared to Pig.

  6. User Interface: Pig provides a command-line interface (CLI) where users can write Pig Latin scripts and interact with the data. Impala, on the other hand, provides a web-based user interface (UI) that allows users to write and run queries without the need for a separate CLI.

In summary, Apache Impala and Pig differ in terms of syntax, execution model, data storage, schema definition, data types, and user interface. Impala offers faster query execution with a more SQL-like syntax, while Pig provides flexibility with its high-level scripting language.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache Impala
Pros of Pig
  • 11
    Super fast
  • 1
    Massively Parallel Processing
  • 1
    Load Balancing
  • 1
    Replication
  • 1
    Scalability
  • 1
    Distributed
  • 1
    High Performance
  • 1
    Open Sourse
  • 2
    Finer-grained control on parallelization
  • 1
    Proven at Petabyte scale
  • 1
    Open-source
  • 1
    Join optimizations for highly skewed data

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Apache Impala?

Impala is a modern, open source, MPP SQL query engine for Apache Hadoop. Impala is shipped by Cloudera, MapR, and Amazon. With Impala, you can query data, whether stored in HDFS or Apache HBase – including SELECT, JOIN, and aggregate functions – in real time.

What is Pig?

Pig is a dataflow programming environment for processing very large files. Pig's language is called Pig Latin. A Pig Latin program consists of a directed acyclic graph where each node represents an operation that transforms data. Operations are of two flavors: (1) relational-algebra style operations such as join, filter, project; (2) functional-programming style operators such as map, reduce.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Apache Impala?
What companies use Pig?
See which teams inside your own company are using Apache Impala or Pig.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Apache Impala?
What tools integrate with Pig?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Apache Impala and Pig?
Presto
Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data
Apache Drill
Apache Drill is a distributed MPP query layer that supports SQL and alternative query languages against NoSQL and Hadoop data storage systems. It was inspired in part by Google's Dremel.
Apache Hive
Hive facilitates reading, writing, and managing large datasets residing in distributed storage using SQL. Structure can be projected onto data already in storage.
Apache Spark
Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
HBase
Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.
See all alternatives