StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. InfluxDB vs Oracle

InfluxDB vs Oracle

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Oracle
Oracle
Stacks2.6K
Followers1.8K
Votes113
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175

InfluxDB vs Oracle: What are the differences?

Introduction

InfluxDB and Oracle are both popular databases used for different purposes. While InfluxDB is designed for time-series data and is used mainly in IoT and monitoring applications, Oracle is a general-purpose relational database that is widely used in enterprise applications. Here are the key differences between InfluxDB and Oracle.

  1. Data Model: InfluxDB uses a time-series data model, where data is stored as a series of timestamped values. This makes it highly optimized for storing and querying time-series data efficiently. On the other hand, Oracle uses a relational data model, where data is organized in tables with predefined schemas, allowing for complex relationships between entities.

  2. Scalability: InfluxDB is designed to handle large volumes of time-series data and provides built-in clustering and sharding capabilities for horizontal scalability. It can easily scale to handle millions of writes per second. In contrast, Oracle requires manual configuration and tuning for scaling to handle large workloads, and vertical scaling (adding more resources to a single machine) is the primary method of increasing performance.

  3. Query Language: InfluxDB uses its own query language called InfluxQL, which is specifically designed for working with time-series data. It provides functions and operators optimized for time-series analysis and supports SQL-like syntax for querying data. On the other hand, Oracle uses SQL (Structured Query Language), which is a standardized language for querying relational databases. SQL provides a wide range of features and capabilities for working with structured data.

  4. Indexing: InfluxDB uses a unique indexing mechanism called an inverted index, which allows for fast retrieval of data based on time ranges. This indexing approach is optimized for time-series data, making queries on time ranges highly efficient. In contrast, Oracle uses various indexing techniques, including B-tree, bitmap, and bitmap join indexes, to optimize query performance for different types of data and query patterns.

  5. Performance: InfluxDB is designed for high-performance time-series data storage and retrieval, with write and query performance being its primary focus. It can handle millions of writes per second and provides fast query response times, making it suitable for real-time monitoring and analytics applications. Oracle, being a general-purpose database, offers a broader range of capabilities but may not provide the same level of performance for time-series data.

  6. Cost: In terms of licensing and maintenance costs, there is a significant difference between InfluxDB and Oracle. InfluxDB is an open-source database and has a community edition available for free, while Oracle is a commercial database and requires a paid license. The cost of Oracle licenses can be substantial, especially for enterprise deployments, making it less accessible for smaller projects or organizations with budget constraints.

In Summary, InfluxDB and Oracle differ in their data models, scalability, query languages, indexing mechanisms, performance focus, and costs. InfluxDB is optimized for time-series data, provides high scalability and performance, and has a lower cost of ownership compared to Oracle. On the other hand, Oracle is a versatile relational database with broader capabilities but may require more manual configuration and incur higher licensing costs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Oracle, InfluxDB

Deepak
Deepak

Sep 6, 2021

Needs adviceonJSONJSONInfluxDBInfluxDB

Hi all, I am trying to decide on a database for time-series data. The data could be tracking some simple series like statistics over time or could be a nested JSON (multi-level nested). I have been experimenting with InfluxDB for the former case of a simple list of variables over time. The continuous queries are powerful too. But for the latter case, where InfluxDB requires to flatten out a nested JSON before saving it into the database the complexity arises. The nested JSON could be objects or a list of objects and objects under objects in which a complete flattening doesn't leave the data in a state for the queries I'm thinking.

[ 
  { "timestamp": "2021-09-06T12:51:00Z",
    "name": "Name1",
    "books": [
        { "title": "Book1", "page": 100 },
        { "title": "Book2", "page": 280 },
    ]
  },
 { "timestamp": "2021-09-06T12:52:00Z",
   "name": "Name2",
   "books": [
       { "title": "Book1", "page": 320},
       { "title": "Book2", "page": 530 },
       { "title": "Book3", "page": 150 },
   ]
 }
]

Sample query: With a time range, for name xyz, find all the book title for which # of page < 400.

If I flatten it completely, it will result in fields like books_0_title, books_0_page, books_1_title, books_1_page, ... And by losing the nested context it will be hard to return one field (title) where some condition for another field (page) satisfies.

Appreciate any suggestions. Even a piece of generic advice on handling the time-series and choosing the database is welcome!

30.5k views30.5k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Data Engineer at Dimensigon

Jul 18, 2020

Decided

We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL-as-a-Service that the users can deploy in any Cloud without concerns from our website at some standard cost. With Oracle Database, developers would have to worry about what they implement and the related costs of each feature but the licensing model from Tibero is just 1 price and we have all features included, so we don't have to worry and developers using our SQLaaS neither. PostgreSQL would be open source. We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL that you can deploy in any Cloud without concerns. PostgreSQL would be the open source option but we need to offer an SQLaaS with encryption and more enterprise features in the background and best value option we have found, it was Tibero Database for PL/SQL-based applications.

495k views495k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Oracle
Oracle
InfluxDB
InfluxDB

Oracle Database is an RDBMS. An RDBMS that implements object-oriented features such as user-defined types, inheritance, and polymorphism is called an object-relational database management system (ORDBMS). Oracle Database has extended the relational model to an object-relational model, making it possible to store complex business models in a relational database.

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

-
Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Statistics
Stacks
2.6K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
1.8K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
113
Votes
175
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Reliable
  • 33
    Enterprise
  • 15
    High Availability
  • 5
    Hard to maintain
  • 5
    Expensive
Cons
  • 14
    Expensive
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    Proprietary query language
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version

What are some alternatives to Oracle, InfluxDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase