InVision vs UXPin

Overview

InVision

Stacks8.5K

Followers5.8K

Votes618

UXPin

Stacks98

Followers130

Votes26

InVision vs UXPin: What are the differences?

Collaboration Features: InVision offers better collaboration features with real-time commenting and feedback options. It allows designers and stakeholders to work together seamlessly, reducing the need for constant back and forth communication. On the other hand, UXPin also has collaboration features, but they are not as robust and intuitive as InVision's.
Prototyping Capabilities: When it comes to prototyping, UXPin provides a more sophisticated and advanced prototyping tool compared to InVision. UXPin allows for more complex interactions and animations, making it a preferred choice for designers looking to create high-fidelity prototypes with intricate interactions.
Design Systems Support: InVision has a more robust design systems support with features like design asset libraries and shared component libraries. It allows designers to create and maintain a centralized repository of design assets that can be used across multiple projects. UXPin also supports design systems, but the implementation is not as seamless as in InVision.
Code Output: UXPin provides better code output options for developers, allowing them to extract clean and organized front-end code directly from the designs. This feature is particularly useful for ensuring design consistency and streamlining the handoff process between designers and developers. In contrast, InVision's code output options are limited, making it less developer-friendly.
Integration Ecosystem: InVision has a larger integration ecosystem with various third-party plugins and integrations with popular design tools like Sketch and Adobe XD. This makes it easier for designers to streamline their workflow and incorporate their favorite tools seamlessly. While UXPin also offers integrations, the options are more limited compared to InVision.
Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, InVision is generally considered more user-friendly and easier to pick up for beginners. Its interface is intuitive, making it easier for designers to get started with creating prototypes and sharing designs. On the other hand, UXPin has a steeper learning curve due to its more advanced features and capabilities, which may require more time and effort to master.

In Summary, InVision excels in collaboration features, while UXPin stands out in prototyping capabilities and code output, making them suitable for different design needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

InVision	UXPin
InVision lets you create stunningly realistic interactive wireframes and prototypes without compromising your creative vision.	It is a code-based design tool that merges design and engineering into one unified process. Thanks to conditional interactions, variables, state-based animations, and powerful expressions, you can build prototypes that feel like the real thing. In other words, anything that's on the web can be accurately prototyped in UXPin.
Quickly link up your UX sketches, digital wireframes and even high-fidelity designs to share with your team.;Send out a link to load your project in a browser, present it in-person, or sms your project direct to a mobile device for an instant touchable demo.;Threaded comments connect to a specific point on-screen and double up as to-dos.;InVision creates a simple project checklist of all the feedback provided from in-screen comments.;Quick glance summaries of each design’s activity let you track progress and allow you to drill down into details.;Collaborate with your team anywhere. Track their engagement in the project at a specific time.;Just save your screens to the InVision Sync folder on your Mac and we’ll take care of the rest. Plus, you’ll get desktop notifications when others leave comments or upload new screens.;Just hit the switch to get additional functionality that integrates throughout your account.	Design powered with code; Prototypes that feel like the real thing; Collaboration doesn’t get easier than this; Design systems at scale
Statistics
Stacks 8.5K	Stacks 98
Followers 5.8K	Followers 130
Votes 618	Votes 26
Pros & Cons
Pros 158 Collaborative 128 Simple 95 Pretty 79 Quick 45 Works with lots of devices	Pros 5 Semantic UI support 5 Can make unique interactions 2 Jira Integration 2 Design Systems 2 Prototyping Cons 1 No free tier
Integrations
Dropbox	Slack Sketch Adobe Photoshop

What are some alternatives to InVision, UXPin?

Balsamiq

Balsamiq Mockups is a web tool that allows users to mock up different designs and ideas quickly and easily. Balsamic Mockups is similar to drawing mockups, but it is digital

Avocode

Avocode is a cross-platform app that helps designers and developers collaborate and easily handoff designs. Avocode comes with 14 days free trial.

Marvel

A super simple tool that turns any image (including PSDs) or sketch into interactive prototypes for any device. Powered by Dropbox.

Proto.io

Proto.io supports all the major mobile gestures and touch events like tap, tap-hold, swipe, pinch, and zoom. Interaction designers are not limited to a single ‘link’ transition anymore. Instead they can apply animated screen transitions like slide, fade, pop, flip, flow, and turn.

Doorbell.io

Free service which enables you to easily gather in-app user feedback, on websites, iOS apps, and Android apps.

Usersnap

Usersnap is the #1 bug tracking tool for every web project. Collaborate on screenshots with colleagues and clients. Usersnap makes tracking bugs and collecting feedback on design drafts and prototypes easy.

Pidoco

It is software that lets you quickly create click-through wireframes and fully interactive UX prototypes.

WebEngage

WebEngage is a customer engagement Saas. It enables gathering of relevant customer data through feedback and survey. It also enables notification of services and discounts to the market. WebEngage offers solution for personalized real time marketing, customer insights, instantaneous feedback and personalized marketing

Atomic

Pull in designs from Photoshop or Sketch, instantly animate between them, and share your prototypes with anyone or view on any device via URL.

Axure

The way to plan, prototype, and hand off to developers, all without code. A wireframing, rapid prototyping, documentation and specification software tool aimed at web, mobile and desktop applications.

Related Comparisons

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack

InVision vs UXPin: What are the differences?

Collaboration Features: InVision offers better collaboration features with real-time commenting and feedback options. It allows designers and stakeholders to work together seamlessly, reducing the need for constant back and forth communication. On the other hand, UXPin also has collaboration features, but they are not as robust and intuitive as InVision's.
Prototyping Capabilities: When it comes to prototyping, UXPin provides a more sophisticated and advanced prototyping tool compared to InVision. UXPin allows for more complex interactions and animations, making it a preferred choice for designers looking to create high-fidelity prototypes with intricate interactions.
Design Systems Support: InVision has a more robust design systems support with features like design asset libraries and shared component libraries. It allows designers to create and maintain a centralized repository of design assets that can be used across multiple projects. UXPin also supports design systems, but the implementation is not as seamless as in InVision.
Code Output: UXPin provides better code output options for developers, allowing them to extract clean and organized front-end code directly from the designs. This feature is particularly useful for ensuring design consistency and streamlining the handoff process between designers and developers. In contrast, InVision's code output options are limited, making it less developer-friendly.
Integration Ecosystem: InVision has a larger integration ecosystem with various third-party plugins and integrations with popular design tools like Sketch and Adobe XD. This makes it easier for designers to streamline their workflow and incorporate their favorite tools seamlessly. While UXPin also offers integrations, the options are more limited compared to InVision.
Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, InVision is generally considered more user-friendly and easier to pick up for beginners. Its interface is intuitive, making it easier for designers to get started with creating prototypes and sharing designs. On the other hand, UXPin has a steeper learning curve due to its more advanced features and capabilities, which may require more time and effort to master.

In Summary, InVision excels in collaboration features, while UXPin stands out in prototyping capabilities and code output, making them suitable for different design needs and preferences.