IronMQ vs NSQ vs RSMQ

IronMQ
IronMQ

29
29
34
NSQ
NSQ

73
92
127
RSMQ
RSMQ

2
6
3
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is NSQ?

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

What is RSMQ?

tl;dr: If you run a Redis server and currently use Amazon SQS or a similar message queue you might as well use this fast little replacement. Using a shared Redis server multiple Node.js processes can send / receive messages.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do developers choose NSQ?
Why do developers choose RSMQ?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using IronMQ?
What are the cons of using NSQ?
What are the cons of using RSMQ?
    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use IronMQ?
    What companies use NSQ?
    What companies use RSMQ?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with IronMQ?
    What tools integrate with NSQ?
    What tools integrate with RSMQ?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to IronMQ, NSQ, and RSMQ?
      RabbitMQ
      RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      Amazon SQS
      Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
      Celery
      Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
      ActiveMQ
      Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about IronMQ, NSQ, and RSMQ
      No stack decisions found
      Interest over time
      Reviews of IronMQ, NSQ, and RSMQ
      Avatar of umuro
      Co-Founder at Publitory
      Review ofIronMQIronMQ

      I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.

      Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.

      How developers use IronMQ, NSQ, and RSMQ
      Avatar of InsideSales.com
      InsideSales.com uses NSQNSQ

      The built-in Gamification that comes with our Playbooks application uses NSQ for work queues and microservice communication.

      Avatar of True Fiction Production AB
      True Fiction Production AB uses IronMQIronMQ

      Process queues

      How much does IronMQ cost?
      How much does NSQ cost?
      How much does RSMQ cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      Pricing unavailable
      News about NSQ
      More news
      News about RSMQ
      More news