IronMQ vs simplehttp vs Sparrow

IronMQ
IronMQ

29
34
44
simplehttp
simplehttp

0
0
0
Sparrow
Sparrow

1
0
0
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is simplehttp?

What is Sparrow?

Sparrow keeps messages in memory, but persists them to disk, using Sqlite, when the queue is shutdown.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do developers choose simplehttp?
Why do developers choose Sparrow?
    Be the first to leave a pro
      Be the first to leave a pro
      What are the cons of using IronMQ?
      What are the cons of using simplehttp?
      What are the cons of using Sparrow?
        Be the first to leave a con
          Be the first to leave a con
          What companies use IronMQ?
          What companies use simplehttp?
          What companies use Sparrow?
            No companies found
              No companies found
              What are some alternatives to IronMQ, simplehttp, and Sparrow?
              RabbitMQ
              RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
              Kafka
              Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
              Amazon SQS
              Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
              Celery
              Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
              ActiveMQ
              Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
              See all alternatives
              What tools integrate with IronMQ?
              What tools integrate with simplehttp?
              What tools integrate with Sparrow?
                No integrations found
                  No integrations found
                  Decisions about IronMQ, simplehttp, and Sparrow
                  No stack decisions found
                  Interest over time
                  Reviews of IronMQ, simplehttp, and Sparrow
                  Avatar of umuro
                  Co-Founder at Publitory
                  Review ofIronMQIronMQ

                  I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.

                  Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.

                  How developers use IronMQ, simplehttp, and Sparrow
                  Avatar of True Fiction Production AB
                  True Fiction Production AB uses IronMQIronMQ

                  Process queues

                  How much does IronMQ cost?
                  How much does simplehttp cost?
                  How much does Sparrow cost?
                  Pricing unavailable
                  Pricing unavailable
                  News about simplehttp
                  More news
                  News about Sparrow
                  More news