SonarQube vs JaCoCo | What are the differences?

Overview

SonarQube

Stacks1.8K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

JaCoCo

Stacks117

Followers82

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks1.2K

JaCoCo vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

JaCoCo and SonarQube are two popular tools used in the software development process to measure code coverage and analyze code quality. Let's explore the key differences between JaCoCo and SonarQube in more detail.

Code Coverage Analysis: JaCoCo focuses on code coverage analysis, providing detailed information about the codebase executed by tests. It supports various coverage metrics and generates comprehensive reports. SonarQube includes code coverage analysis as one of its features but offers a broader range of code quality analysis capabilities.
Code Quality Analysis: SonarQube is a comprehensive code quality management platform that provides a wide range of code analysis features. It performs static code analysis to identify issues such as code smells, security vulnerabilities, code duplications, and architectural violations. SonarQube analyzes code quality from multiple dimensions, including maintainability, reliability, security, and efficiency. It offers a rich set of rules and provides detailed reports and metrics to help developers and teams improve code quality.
Integration: JaCoCo integrates with build systems and testing frameworks, generating coverage reports in different formats. It can be seamlessly integrated into build tools like Maven, Gradle, and Ant. SonarQube provides a centralized platform for code analysis, integrating with build systems, CI/CD pipelines, and version control systems for continuous analysis and feedback.
Visualization and Reporting: JaCoCo generates detailed coverage reports that can be visualized using HTML-based reports or custom tools. The reports show coverage statistics at different levels and help identify areas needing more test coverage. SonarQube offers comprehensive dashboards and reports, providing a holistic view of code quality. It generates visualizations, metrics, and trends to track progress and prioritize code quality efforts.
Community and Support: JaCoCo has an active open-source community, extensive documentation, and a GitHub repository for issue tracking. SonarQube, as a comprehensive code quality management platform, also has a strong community and support system. It offers comprehensive documentation, forums, and community support for users.

In summary, JaCoCo focuses primarily on code coverage analysis, while SonarQube provides a broader range of code quality analysis features. JaCoCo is typically used as a standalone tool for coverage analysis, whereas SonarQube offers a comprehensive platform for code quality management and integrates with various development tools and processes.

🔥 Trending in Code Review on StackShare

Graphite.dev Code Review

Stacked Diffs on GitHub

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

3

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube	JaCoCo
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.	It is a free code coverage library for Java, which has been created based on the lessons learned from using and integration existing libraries for many years.
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.0K	GitHub Stars 4.4K
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 1.8K	Stacks 117
Followers 2.0K	Followers 82
Votes 53	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 1 Does not integrate with Snyk	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, JaCoCo?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.